Back to Search
Start Over
Cost-Effectiveness of Ibrutinib Compared With Obinutuzumab With Chlorambucil in Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients With Comorbidities in the United Kingdom.
- Source :
-
Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia [Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk] 2018 Feb; Vol. 18 (2), pp. e131-e142. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Dec 29. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Background: Ibrutinib shows superiority over obinutuzumab with chlorambucil (G-Clb) in untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia with comorbidities who cannot tolerate fludarabine-based therapy. However, ibrutinib is relatively more expensive than G-Clb. In this study we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of ibrutinib compared with G-Clb from the United Kingdom (UK) health care perspective.<br />Materials and Methods: A 3-state semi-Markov model was parameterized to estimate the lifetime costs and benefits associated with ibrutinib compared with G-Clb as first-line treatment. Idelalisib with rituximab was considered as second-line treatment. Unit costs were derived from standard sources, (dis)utilities from UK elicitation studies, progression-free survival, progression, and death from clinical trials, and postprogression survival and background mortality from published sources. Additional analyses included threshold analyses with ibrutinib and idelalisib at various discount rates, and scenario analysis with ibrutinib as second-line treatment after G-Clb.<br />Results: An average gain of 1.49 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) was estimated for ibrutinib compared with G-Clb at an average additional cost of £112,835 per patient. To be cost-effective as per the UK thresholds, ibrutinib needs to be discounted at 30%, 40%, and 50% if idelalisib is discounted at 0%, 25%, and 50% respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £75,648 and £-143,279 per QALY gained for the base-case and scenario analyses, respectively. Sensitivity analyses showed the robustness of the results.<br />Conclusion: As per base-case analyses, an adequate discount on ibrutinib is required to make it cost-effective as per the UK thresholds. The scenario analysis substantiates ibrutinib's cost-savings for the UK National Health Services and advocates patient's access to ibrutinib in the UK.<br /> (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Adenine analogs & derivatives
Aged
Anemia chemically induced
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects
Antineoplastic Agents adverse effects
Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use
Chlorambucil adverse effects
Comorbidity
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Drug Therapy economics
Female
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell epidemiology
Male
Markov Chains
Neutropenia chemically induced
Outcome Assessment, Health Care economics
Piperidines
Pyrazoles adverse effects
Pyrimidines adverse effects
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
United Kingdom epidemiology
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use
Chlorambucil therapeutic use
Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell drug therapy
Pyrazoles therapeutic use
Pyrimidines therapeutic use
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2152-2669
- Volume :
- 18
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 29398648
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2017.12.005