Back to Search Start Over

Health-Related Quality of Life with Subcutaneous C1-Inhibitor for Prevention of Attacks of Hereditary Angioedema.

Authors :
Lumry WR
Craig T
Zuraw B
Longhurst H
Baker J
Li HH
Bernstein JA
Anderson J
Riedl MA
Manning ME
Keith PK
Levy DS
Caballero T
Banerji A
Gower RG
Farkas H
Lawo JP
Pragst I
Machnig T
Watson DJ
Source :
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice [J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract] 2018 Sep - Oct; Vol. 6 (5), pp. 1733-1741.e3. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Jan 31.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: Hereditary angioedema with C1-inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) impairs health-related quality of life (HRQoL).<br />Objective: The objective of this study was to assess HRQoL outcomes in patients self-administering subcutaneous C1-INH (C1-INH[SC]; HAEGARDA) for routine prevention of HAE attacks.<br />Methods: Post hoc analysis of data from the placebo-controlled, crossover phase III COMPACT study (Clinical Studies for Optimal Management of Preventing Angioedema with Low-Volume Subcutaneous C1-Inhibitor Replacement Therapy). Ninety patients with C1-INH-HAE were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment sequences: C1-INH(SC) 40 or 60 IU/kg twice weekly for 16 weeks, preceded or followed by 16 weeks of twice weekly placebo injections. All HAE attacks were treated with open-label on-demand treatment as necessary. HRQoL assessments at week 14 (last visit) included the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI), and the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM).<br />Results: Compared with placebo (on-demand treatment alone), treatment with twice weekly C1-INH(SC) (both doses combined) was associated with better EQ-5D visual analog scale general health, less HADS anxiety, less WPAI presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment, and greater TSQM effectiveness and overall treatment satisfaction. More patients self-reported a "good/excellent" response during routine prevention with C1-INH(SC) compared with on-demand only (placebo prophylaxis) management. For each HRQoL measure, a greater proportion of patients had a clinically meaningful improvement during C1-INH(SC) treatment compared with placebo.<br />Conclusions: In patients with frequent HAE attacks, a treatment strategy of routine prevention with self-administered twice weekly C1-INH(SC) had a greater impact on improving multiple HAE-related HRQoL impairments, most notably anxiety and work productivity, compared with on-demand treatment alone (placebo prophylaxis).<br /> (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2213-2201
Volume :
6
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29391286
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2017.12.039