Back to Search
Start Over
Should Acetabular Retroversion Be Treated Arthroscopically? A Systematic Review of Open Versus Arthroscopic Techniques.
- Source :
-
Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association [Arthroscopy] 2018 Mar; Vol. 34 (3), pp. 953-966. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Jan 17. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Purpose: To compare patient-reported outcomes, progression of radiographic arthritis, revision rates, and complications for hips with acetabular retroversion treated by open versus arthroscopic methods.<br />Methods: The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched in August 2016 for literature on the open and arthroscopic techniques using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) method. All studies published in the English language that focused on the surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement caused by retroversion were included. All arthroscopic procedures, such as acetabuloplasty and labral repair, and open procedures, including anteverting periacetabular osteotomy and surgical dislocation with osteoplasty, were included. Articles that did not describe how retroversion was defined were excluded, as were studies with less than 6 months' follow-up and fewer than 5 patients. Two authors screened the results and selected articles for this review based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All results were scored using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.<br />Results: There were 386 results returned and 15 articles that met the inclusion criteria of this study. Among the studies, 11 reviewed arthroscopic techniques and 4 reviewed open surgical procedures. Both techniques yield good results based on patient-reported outcomes with minimal progression of osteoarthritis and low complication rates.<br />Conclusions: This review showed statistically and clinically significant improvements for the treatment of acetabular retroversion based on patient-reported outcomes, with low progression of radiographic arthritis, revision rates, and complications using both open and arthroscopic methods.<br />Level of Evidence: Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.<br /> (Copyright © 2017 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Acetabuloplasty adverse effects
Acetabuloplasty methods
Bone Retroversion complications
Disease Progression
Femoracetabular Impingement etiology
Femoracetabular Impingement surgery
Humans
Osteoarthritis etiology
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Postoperative Complications
Reoperation
Treatment Outcome
Acetabulum surgery
Arthroscopy adverse effects
Arthroscopy methods
Bone Retroversion surgery
Osteotomy adverse effects
Osteotomy methods
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1526-3231
- Volume :
- 34
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 29373292
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.09.013