Back to Search Start Over

Multiparametric characterization of response to anti-angiogenic therapy using USPIO contrast-enhanced MRI in combination with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors :
Kim J
Kim E
Euceda LR
Meyer DE
Langseth K
Bathen TF
Moestue SA
Huuse EM
Source :
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI [J Magn Reson Imaging] 2018 Jun; Vol. 47 (6), pp. 1589-1600. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Dec 04.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: Steady state susceptibility contrast (SSC)-MRI provides information on vascular morphology but is a rarely used method.<br />Purpose: To investigate the utility of the ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (USPIOs) GEH121333 for measuring tumor response to bevacizumab and compare this with gadolinium-based DCE-MRI.<br />Study Type: Prospective preclinical animal model study.<br />Animal Model: Mice bearing subcutaneous TOV-21G human ovarian cancer xenografts treated with bevacizumab (n = 9) or saline (n = 9).<br />Field Strength/sequence: Imaging was performed on a 7T Bruker Biospec. For SSC-MRI with GEH121333 we acquired R <subscript>1</subscript> -maps (RARE-sequence with variable TR), R <subscript>2</subscript> -maps (multi-spin echo), and R2*-maps (multi-gradient echo). Additionally, R <subscript>1</subscript> and R <subscript>2</subscript> maps were measured on the days after USPIO injection. For DCE-MRI with gadodiamide we acquired 200 T <subscript>1</subscript> -weighted images (RARE-sequence).<br />Assessment: ΔR <subscript>1</subscript> , ΔR <subscript>2</subscript> , and ΔR2* maps were computed from SSC-MRI. DCE-MRI was analysed using the extended Tofts model.<br />Statistical Tests: Results from pre- and 3 days posttreatment SSC-MRI were compared using paired-sample t-tests. Treatment and control groups were compared using independent sample t-tests. Performance of SSC- and DCE-MRI was compared using multivariate partial least squares discriminant analysis.<br />Results: Already one day after treatment and USPIO injection, R <subscript>1</subscript> and R <subscript>2</subscript> values were lower in treated (R <subscript>1</subscript>  = 0.49 ± 0.03s <superscript>-1</superscript> , R <subscript>2</subscript>  = 23.07 ± 1.49s <superscript>-1</superscript> ) compared with control tumors (R <subscript>1</subscript>  = 0.52 ± 0.02s <superscript>-1</superscript> , R <subscript>2</subscript>  = 24.98 ± 1.01s <superscript>-1</superscript> ), indicating lower USPIO accumulation. Posttreatment SSC-MRI displayed significantly decreased tumor blood volume (change in ΔR <subscript>2</subscript>  = -0.43 ± 0.26s <superscript>-1</superscript> , P = 0.001) and vessel density (change in Q = -0.032 ± 0.020s <superscript>-1/3</superscript> , P = 0.002). DCE-MRI showed among others lower K <superscript>trans</superscript> in treated tumors (control = 0.064 ± 0.011min <superscript>-1</superscript> , tx = 0.046 ± 0.008min <superscript>-1</superscript> , P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis suggests that SSC-MRI was slightly inferior to DCE-MRI in distinguishing treated from control tumors (accuracy = 75%, P = 0.058 versus 80%, P = 0.028), but a combination of both was best (accuracy = 85%; P = 0.003).<br />Data Conclusion: SSC-MRI with GEH121333 is sensitive to early (<24 h) and late changes in tumor vasculature. SSC-MRI and DCE-MRI provide complementary information and can be used to assess different aspects of vascular responses to anti-angiogenic therapies.<br />Level of Evidence: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1589-1600.<br /> (© 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1522-2586
Volume :
47
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29205621
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25898