Back to Search Start Over

Patients with left bundle branch block and left axis deviation show a specific left ventricular asynchrony pattern: Implications for left ventricular lead placement during CRT implantation.

Authors :
Sciarra L
Golia P
Palamà Z
Scarà A
De Ruvo E
Borrelli A
Martino AM
Minati M
Fagagnini A
Tota C
De Luca L
Grieco D
Delise P
Calò L
Source :
Journal of electrocardiology [J Electrocardiol] 2018 Mar - Apr; Vol. 51 (2), pp. 175-181. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Oct 21.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and left axis deviation (LAD) patients may have poor response to resynchronization therapy (CRT). We sought to assess if LBBB and LAD patients show a specific pattern of mechanical asynchrony.<br />Methods: CRT candidates with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and LBBB were categorized as having normal QRS axis (within -30° and +90°) or LAD (within -30° and -90°). Patients underwent tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) to measure time interval between onset of QRS complex and peak systolic velocity in ejection period (Q-peak) at basal segments of septal, inferior, lateral and anterior walls, as expression of local timing of mechanical activation.<br />Results: Thirty patients (mean age 70.6years; 19 males) were included. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.28±0.06. Mean QRS duration was 172.5±13.9ms. Fifteen patients showed LBBB with LAD (QRS duration 173±14; EF 0.27±0.06). The other 15 patients had LBBB with a normal QRS axis (QRS duration 172±14; EF 0.29±0.05). Among patients with LAD, Q-peak interval was significantly longer at the anterior wall in comparison to each other walls (septal 201±46ms, inferior 242±58ms, lateral 267±45ms, anterior 302±50ms; p<0.0001). Conversely, in patients without LAD Q-peak interval was longer at lateral wall, when compared to each other (septal 228±65ms, inferior 250±64ms, lateral 328±98ms, anterior 291±86ms; p<0.0001).<br />Conclusions: Patients with heart failure, presenting LBBB and LAD, show a specific pattern of ventricular asynchrony, with latest activation at anterior wall. This finding could affect target vessel selection during CRT procedures in these patients.<br /> (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-8430
Volume :
51
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of electrocardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29174022
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.10.006