Back to Search Start Over

Outcomes of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve-in-Valve Implantation in Patients With Ebstein Anomaly.

Authors :
Taggart NW
Cabalka AK
Eicken A
Aboulhosn JA
Thomson JDR
Whisenant B
Bocks ML
Schubert S
Jones TK
Asnes JD
Fagan TE
Meadows J
Hoyer M
Martin MH
Ing FF
Turner DR
Latib A
Tzifa A
Windecker S
Goldstein BH
Delaney JW
Kuo JA
Foerster S
Gillespie M
Butera G
Shahanavaz S
Horlick E
Boudjemline Y
Dvir D
McElhinney DB
Source :
The American journal of cardiology [Am J Cardiol] 2018 Jan 15; Vol. 121 (2), pp. 262-268. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Oct 19.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

We sought to describe the acute results and short- to medium-term durability of transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve (TVIV) implantation within surgical bioprostheses among patients with Ebstein anomaly (EA). Cases were identified from a voluntary, multicenter, international registry of 29 institutions that perform TVIV. Demographic, clinical, procedural, and follow-up data were analyzed. Eighty-one patients with EA underwent TVIV from 2008 to 2016. Thirty-four patients (42%) were New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 3/4 at time of TVIV. The most common indication for TVIV was the presence of moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation (40%). Most patients received a Melody valve (64%). TVIV was ultimately successful in all patients, and there was no procedural mortality. Four patients (5%) developed acute valve thrombosis, 4 patients (5%) developed endocarditis, and 9 patients (11%) developed valve dysfunction not related to thrombosis or endocarditis. Eight patients (10%) underwent reintervention (2 transcatheter, 6 surgical) due to thrombosis (3), endocarditis (2), other valve dysfunction (2), and patient-prosthesis mismatch without valve dysfunction (1). Among 69 patients who were alive without reintervention at latest follow-up, 96% of those with NYHA status reported were class 1/2, a significant improvement from baseline (62% NYHA class 1/2, p <0.001). In conclusion, transcatheter TVIV offers a low-risk, minimally invasive alternative to surgical tricuspid valve re-replacement in patients with EA and a failing tricuspid valve bioprosthesis.<br /> (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-1913
Volume :
121
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The American journal of cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29153244
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.10.017