Back to Search Start Over

Aspirin in Patients With Previous Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery.

Authors :
Graham MM
Sessler DI
Parlow JL
Biccard BM
Guyatt G
Leslie K
Chan MTV
Meyhoff CS
Xavier D
Sigamani A
Kumar PA
Mrkobrada M
Cook DJ
Tandon V
Alvarez-Garcia J
Villar JC
Painter TW
Landoni G
Fleischmann E
Lamy A
Whitlock R
Le Manach Y
Aphang-Lam M
Cata JP
Gao P
Terblanche NCS
Ramana PV
Jamieson KA
Bessissow A
Mendoza GR
Ramirez S
Diemunsch PA
Yusuf S
Devereaux PJ
Source :
Annals of internal medicine [Ann Intern Med] 2018 Feb 20; Vol. 168 (4), pp. 237-244. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Nov 14.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: Uncertainty remains about the effects of aspirin in patients with prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) having noncardiac surgery.<br />Objective: To evaluate benefits and harms of perioperative aspirin in patients with prior PCI.<br />Design: Nonprespecified subgroup analysis of a multicenter factorial trial. Computerized Internet randomization was done between 2010 and 2013. Patients, clinicians, data collectors, and outcome adjudicators were blinded to treatment assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01082874).<br />Setting: 135 centers in 23 countries.<br />Patients: Adults aged 45 years or older who had or were at risk for atherosclerotic disease and were having noncardiac surgery. Exclusions were placement of a bare-metal stent within 6 weeks, placement of a drug-eluting stent within 1 year, or receipt of nonstudy aspirin within 72 hours before surgery.<br />Intervention: Aspirin therapy (overall trial, n = 4998; subgroup, n = 234) or placebo (overall trial, n = 5012; subgroup, n = 236) initiated within 4 hours before surgery and continued throughout the perioperative period. Of the 470 subgroup patients, 99.9% completed follow-up.<br />Measurements: The 30-day primary outcome was death or nonfatal myocardial infarction; bleeding was a secondary outcome.<br />Results: In patients with prior PCI, aspirin reduced the risk for the primary outcome (absolute risk reduction, 5.5% [95% CI, 0.4% to 10.5%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.50 [CI, 0.26 to 0.95]; P for interaction = 0.036) and for myocardial infarction (absolute risk reduction, 5.9% [CI, 1.0% to 10.8%]; HR, 0.44 [CI, 0.22 to 0.87]; P for interaction = 0.021). The effect on the composite of major and life-threatening bleeding in patients with prior PCI was uncertain (absolute risk increase, 1.3% [CI, -2.6% to 5.2%]). In the overall population, aspirin increased the risk for major bleeding (absolute risk increase, 0.8% [CI, 0.1% to 1.6%]; HR, 1.22 [CI, 1.01 to 1.48]; P for interaction = 0.50).<br />Limitation: Nonprespecified subgroup analysis with small sample.<br />Conclusion: Perioperative aspirin may be more likely to benefit rather than harm patients with prior PCI.<br />Primary Funding Source: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1539-3704
Volume :
168
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annals of internal medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29132159
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.7326/M17-2341