Back to Search
Start Over
How we can measure the non-driving-task engagement in automated driving: Comparing flow experience and workload.
- Source :
-
Applied ergonomics [Appl Ergon] 2018 Feb; Vol. 67, pp. 237-245. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Oct 23. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- In automated driving, a driver can completely concentrate on non-driving-related tasks (NDRTs). This study investigated the flow experience of a driver who concentrated on NDRTs and tasks that induce mental workload under conditional automation. Participants performed NDRTs under different demand levels: a balanced demand-skill level (fit condition) to induce flow, low-demand level to induce boredom, and high-demand level to induce anxiety. In addition, they performed the additional N-Back task, which artificially induces mental workload. The results showed participants had the longest reaction time when they indicated the highest flow score, and had the longest gaze-on time, road-fixation time, hands-on time, and take-over time under the fit condition. Significant differences were not observed in the driver reaction times in the fit condition and the additional N-Back task, indicating that performing NDRTs that induce a high flow experience could influence driver reaction time similar to performing tasks with a high mental workload.<br /> (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1872-9126
- Volume :
- 67
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Applied ergonomics
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 29122195
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.10.009