Back to Search Start Over

How we can measure the non-driving-task engagement in automated driving: Comparing flow experience and workload.

Authors :
Ko SM
Ji YG
Source :
Applied ergonomics [Appl Ergon] 2018 Feb; Vol. 67, pp. 237-245. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Oct 23.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

In automated driving, a driver can completely concentrate on non-driving-related tasks (NDRTs). This study investigated the flow experience of a driver who concentrated on NDRTs and tasks that induce mental workload under conditional automation. Participants performed NDRTs under different demand levels: a balanced demand-skill level (fit condition) to induce flow, low-demand level to induce boredom, and high-demand level to induce anxiety. In addition, they performed the additional N-Back task, which artificially induces mental workload. The results showed participants had the longest reaction time when they indicated the highest flow score, and had the longest gaze-on time, road-fixation time, hands-on time, and take-over time under the fit condition. Significant differences were not observed in the driver reaction times in the fit condition and the additional N-Back task, indicating that performing NDRTs that induce a high flow experience could influence driver reaction time similar to performing tasks with a high mental workload.<br /> (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1872-9126
Volume :
67
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Applied ergonomics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29122195
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.10.009