Back to Search
Start Over
Strategies for reducing ovarian dose in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for postoperative uterine cervical cancer.
- Source :
-
The British journal of radiology [Br J Radiol] 2018 Jan; Vol. 91 (1081), pp. 20160777. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Nov 03. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Objective: To reduce the ovarian dose with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), an original VMAT was designed with two types of arcs to restrict angles and fields (R-VMAT).<br />Methods: The subjects were 11 patients who underwent ovarian transposition with clips left by a surgeon. Three methods, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), standard VMAT (S-VMAT) and R-VMAT, were optimized for assessment of the ovarian dose with the target coverage kept high.<br />Results: The homogeneity and conformity indexes for the planning target volume (PTV) were similar for the three methods. However, the average ± SD of the ovarian mean dose (OMD) was 5.0 ± 1.5, 4.9 ± 1.9 and 3.5 ± 1.4 Gy, and the percentage of ovarian volume exceeding 5 Gy (V5) was 41.5 ± 34.1%, 34.1 ± 38.05% and 8.4 ± 20.5% for IMRT, S-VMAT and R-VMAT, respectively. The OMD and V5 were significantly smaller for R-VMAT than for the other plans (p < 0.01). Correlation values between the OMD and the lateral distance from the ovaries to the PTV surface were 0.86, 0.81 and 0.82 for IMRT, S-VMAT and R-VMAT, respectively.<br />Conclusion: These findings suggest that R-VMAT delivered the lowest dose to the ovaries. To reduce the OMD to less than 3 Gy, ovaries should be transposed laterally 6.1 cm away from the PTV surface when R-VMAT is used. Advances in knowledge: When organs with high susceptibility to radiation, such as ovaries, are near the PTV, R-VMAT is superior to IMRT and S-VMAT.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1748-880X
- Volume :
- 91
- Issue :
- 1081
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The British journal of radiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 29072492
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160777