Back to Search Start Over

High prevalence of diabetes and abnormal glucose tolerance in Thai women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors :
Wanthong S
Lertwattanarak R
Sunsaneevithayakul P
Sriussadaporn S
Vannasaeng S
Sriwijitkamol A
Source :
Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology [J Clin Transl Endocrinol] 2017 Jun 29; Vol. 9, pp. 21-24. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jun 29 (Print Publication: 2017).
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Aim: To determine the prevalence of and risk factors for abnormal glucose tolerance (AGT) in previous gestational diabetes mellitus (pGDM) women .<br />Methods: 100 pGDM women randomly selected from the database of the Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology. 75 g-OGTT were performed in subjects without known diabetes. AGT was diagnosed using the American Diabetes Association criteria.<br />Results: The mean age, pre-gestational BMI, and time since delivery were 38 ± 5 years, 24.5 ± 5.7 kg/m <superscript>2</superscript> , and 46 ± 26 months. Overall, 81% of the subjects had AGT, including IGT (38%), IGT + IFG (5%), T2DM (38%). Plasma glucose ( PG) at 1 h after a 50 g-glucose challenge test (GCT) , PG at 1 h after 100 g-OGTT, HbA <subscript>1c</subscript> , and HOMA-IR were significantly greater in women with AGT than normal glucose tolerance (NGT) women. The proportion of women with ≥3 abnormal PG values during 100 g-OGTT was greater in AGT than NGT group (50.7% vs. 15.8%). Multivariate analysis showed that PG ≥ 150 mg/dl at 1 h after a 50 g-GCT and ≥3 abnormal PG values in 100 g-OGTTs were risk factors for developing AGT.<br />Conclusions: Eighty-one percent of pGDM women developed AGT within 4 years after delivery. Risk factors for AGT were PG ≥ 150 mg/dl at 1 h after a 50 g-GCT and ≥3 abnormal PG values in a 100 g-OGTT.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2214-6237
Volume :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29067265
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcte.2017.06.004