Back to Search
Start Over
Management of Persistent Angina After Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the TRANSLATE-ACS Study.
- Source :
-
Journal of the American Heart Association [J Am Heart Assoc] 2017 Oct 19; Vol. 6 (10). Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Oct 19. - Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Background: Angina has important implications for patients' quality of life and healthcare utilization. Angina management after acute myocardial infarction (MI) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown.<br />Methods and Results: TRANSLATE-ACS (Treatment With Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Inhibitors: Longitudinal Assessment of Treatment Patterns and Events After Acute Coronary Syndrome) was a longitudinal study of MI patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention at 233 US hospitals from 2010 to 2012. Among patients with self-reported angina at 6 weeks post-MI, we described patterns of angina and antianginal medication use through 1 year postdischarge. Of 10 870 percutaneous coronary intervention-treated MI patients, 3190 (29.3%) reported angina symptoms at 6 weeks post-MI; of these, 658 (20.6%) had daily/weekly angina while 2532 (79.4%) had monthly angina. Among patients with 6-week angina, 2936 (92.0%) received β-blockers during the 1 year post-MI, yet only 743 (23.3%) were treated with other antianginal medications. At 1 year, 1056 patients (33.1%) with 6-week angina reported persistent angina symptoms. Of these, only 31.2% had been prescribed non-β-blocker antianginal medications at any time in the past year. Among patients undergoing revascularization during follow-up, only 25.9% were on ≥1 non-β-blocker anti-anginal medication at the time of the procedure.<br />Conclusions: Angina is present in one third of percutaneous coronary intervention-treated MI patients as early as 6 weeks after discharge, and many of these patients have persistent angina at 1 year. Non-β-blocker antianginal medications are infrequently used in these patients, even among those with persistent angina and those undergoing revascularization.<br /> (© 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Angina Pectoris diagnosis
Angina Pectoris epidemiology
Cardiovascular Agents adverse effects
Drug Prescriptions
Drug Utilization Review
Female
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Middle Aged
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction diagnosis
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction epidemiology
Patient Discharge
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors adverse effects
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Prevalence
Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists adverse effects
Risk Factors
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction diagnosis
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction epidemiology
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
United States epidemiology
Angina Pectoris therapy
Cardiovascular Agents therapeutic use
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction therapy
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention adverse effects
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors therapeutic use
Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists therapeutic use
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction therapy
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2047-9980
- Volume :
- 6
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of the American Heart Association
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 29051217
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007007