Back to Search Start Over

Mechanistic Basis of Cocrystal Dissolution Advantage.

Authors :
Cao F
Amidon GL
Rodríguez-Hornedo N
Amidon GE
Source :
Journal of pharmaceutical sciences [J Pharm Sci] 2018 Jan; Vol. 107 (1), pp. 380-389. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Oct 06.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Current interest in cocrystal development resides in the advantages that the cocrystal may have in solubility and dissolution compared with the parent drug. This work provides a mechanistic analysis and comparison of the dissolution behavior of carbamazepine (CBZ) and its 2 cocrystals, carbamazepine-saccharin (CBZ-SAC) and carbamazepine-salicylic acid (CBZ-SLC) under the influence of pH and micellar solubilization. A simple mathematical equation is derived based on the mass transport analyses to describe the dissolution advantage of cocrystals. The dissolution advantage is the ratio of the cocrystal flux to drug flux and is defined as the solubility advantage (cocrystal to drug solubility ratio) times the diffusivity advantage (cocrystal to drug diffusivity ratio). In this work, the effective diffusivity of CBZ in the presence of surfactant was determined to be different and less than those of the cocrystals. The higher effective diffusivity of drug from the dissolved cocrystals, the diffusivity advantage, can impart a dissolution advantage to cocrystals with lower solubility than the parent drug while still maintaining thermodynamic stability. Dissolution conditions where cocrystals can display both thermodynamic stability and a dissolution advantage can be obtained from the mass transport models, and this information is useful for both cocrystal selection and formulation development.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1520-6017
Volume :
107
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of pharmaceutical sciences
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28989017
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2017.09.014