Back to Search
Start Over
Effect of MRI on preterm infants and their families: a randomised trial with nested diagnostic and economic evaluation.
- Source :
-
Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition [Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed] 2018 Jan; Vol. 103 (1), pp. F15-F21. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Oct 07. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Background: We tested the hypothesis that routine MRI would improve the care and well-being of preterm infants and their families.<br />Design: Parallel-group randomised trial (1.1 allocation; intention-to-treat) with nested diagnostic and cost evaluations (EudraCT 2009-011602-42).<br />Setting: Participants from 14 London hospitals, imaged at a single centre.<br />Patients: 511 infants born before 33 weeks gestation underwent both MRI and ultrasound around term. 255 were randomly allocated (siblings together) to receive only MRI results and 255 only ultrasound from a paediatrician unaware of unallocated results; one withdrew before allocation.<br />Main Outcome Measures: Maternal anxiety, measured by the State-Trait Anxiety inventory (STAI) assessed in 206/214 mothers receiving MRI and 217/220 receiving ultrasound. Secondary outcomes included: prediction of neurodevelopment, health-related costs and quality of life.<br />Results: After MRI, STAI fell from 36.81 (95% CI 35.18 to 38.44) to 32.77 (95% CI 31.54 to 34.01), 31.87 (95% CI 30.63 to 33.12) and 31.82 (95% CI 30.65 to 33.00) at 14 days, 12 and 20 months, respectively. STAI fell less after ultrasound: from 37.59 (95% CI 36.00 to 39.18) to 33.97 (95% CI 32.78 to 35.17), 33.43 (95% CI 32.22 to 34.63) and 33.63 (95% CI 32.49 to 34.77), p=0.02. There were no differences in health-related quality of life. MRI predicted moderate or severe functional motor impairment at 20 months slightly better than ultrasound (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (CI) 0.74; 0.66 to 0.83 vs 0.64; 0.56 to 0.72, p=0.01) but cost £315 (CI £295-£336) more per infant.<br />Conclusions: MRI increased costs and provided only modest benefits.<br />Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01049594 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01049594. EudraCT: EudraCT: 2009-011602-42 (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/).<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.<br /> (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Child Development
Female
Gestational Age
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature physiology
Male
Neurologic Examination methods
Neurologic Examination statistics & numerical data
Postnatal Care economics
Postnatal Care methods
Treatment Outcome
Anxiety diagnosis
Anxiety etiology
Brain diagnostic imaging
Brain growth & development
Magnetic Resonance Imaging economics
Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods
Magnetic Resonance Imaging psychology
Maternal Behavior psychology
Ultrasonography economics
Ultrasonography methods
Ultrasonography psychology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1468-2052
- Volume :
- 103
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 28988160
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-313102