Back to Search Start Over

Chemical characteristics and sources of PM 1 during the 2016 summer in Hangzhou.

Authors :
Li K
Chen L
White SJ
Zheng X
Lv B
Lin C
Bao Z
Wu X
Gao X
Ying F
Shen J
Azzi M
Cen K
Source :
Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) [Environ Pollut] 2018 Jan; Vol. 232, pp. 42-54. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Sep 19.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

During the 2016 Hangzhou G20 Summit, the chemical composition of submicron particles (PM <subscript>1</subscript> ) was measured by a High-Resolution Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (HR-ToF-AMS) along with a suite of collocated instruments. The campaign was undertaken between August 5 and September 23, 2016. The impacts of emission controls and meteorological conditions on PM <subscript>1</subscript> chemical composition, diurnal cycles, organic aerosol (OA) source apportionment, size distribution and elemental ratios were characterized in detail. Excluding rainy days, the mean PM <subscript>1</subscript> mass concentration during G20 was 30.3 μg/m <superscript>3</superscript> , similar to that observed before G20 (28.6 μg/m <superscript>3</superscript> ), but much lower than that after G20 (42.7 μg/m <superscript>3</superscript> ). The aerosol chemistry during the three periods was substantially different. Before G20, high PM <subscript>1</subscript> loading mostly occurred at daytime, with OA accounting for 60.1% of PM <subscript>1</subscript> , followed by sulfate (15.6%) and ammonium (9.1%). During G20, the OA fraction decreased from 60.1% to 44.6%, whereas secondary inorganic aerosol (SIA) increased from 31.8% to 49.5%. After G20, SIA dominated high PM <subscript>1</subscript> loading, especially at nighttime. Further analysis showed that the nighttime regional transport might play an unfavorable role in the slight increase of secondary PM <subscript>1</subscript> during G20, while the strict emissions controls were implemented. The OA (O/C = 0.58) during G20 was more aged, 48.7% and 13.7% higher than that before and after G20 respectively. Our study highlighted that the emission controls during G20 were of great success in lowering locally produced aerosol and pollutants, despite of co-existence of nighttime regional transport containing aerosol high in low-volatile organics and sulfate. It was implied that not only are emissions controls on both local and regional scale important, but that the transport of pollutants needs to be sufficiently well accounted for, to ensure the successful implementation of air pollution mitigation campaigns in China.<br /> (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-6424
Volume :
232
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28935404
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.016