Back to Search Start Over

Total cosine R-to-T for predicting ventricular arrhythmic and mortality outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors :
Tse G
Gong M
Wong CW
Chan C
Georgopoulos S
Chan YS
Yan BP
Li G
Whittaker P
Ciobanu A
Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh S
Wong SH
Wu WKK
Bazoukis G
Lampropoulos K
Wong WT
Tse LA
Baranchuk AM
Letsas KP
Liu T
Source :
Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc [Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol] 2018 Mar; Vol. 23 (2), pp. e12495. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Sep 12.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: The total cosine R-to-T (TCRT), a vectorcardiographic marker reflecting the spatial difference between the depolarization and repolarization wavefronts, has been used to predict ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in different clinical settings. However, its prognostic value has been controversial.<br />Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the significance of TRCT in predicting arrhythmic and/or mortality endpoints.<br />Methods: PubMed and Embase databases were searched through December 31, 2016.<br />Results: Of the 890 studies identified initially, 13 observational studies were included in our meta-analysis. A total of 11,528 patients, mean age 47 years old, 72% male, were followed for 43 ± 6 months. Data from five studies demonstrated lower TCRT values in myocardial infarction patients with adverse events (syncope, ventricular arrhythmias, or sudden cardiac death) compared to those without these events (mean difference = -0.36 ± 0.05, p < .001; I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 48%). By contrast, only two studies analyzed outcomes in heart failure, and pooled meta-analysis did not demonstrate significant difference in TCRT between event-positive and event-negative patients (mean difference = -0.01 ± 0.10, p > .05; I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 80%).<br />Conclusion: TCRT is lower in MI patients at high risk of adverse events when compared to those free from such events. It can provide additional risk stratification beyond the use of clinical parameters and traditional electrocardiogram markers. Its value in other diseases such as heart failure requires further studies.<br /> (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1542-474X
Volume :
23
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28901628
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.12495