Back to Search Start Over

Target volume delineation of anal cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography.

Authors :
Rusten E
Rekstad BL
Undseth C
Al-Haidari G
Hanekamp B
Hernes E
Hellebust TP
Malinen E
Guren MG
Source :
Radiation oncology (London, England) [Radiat Oncol] 2017 Sep 06; Vol. 12 (1), pp. 147. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Sep 06.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Purpose: To compare target volume delineation of anal cancer using positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with respect to inter-observer and inter-modality variability.<br />Methods: Nineteen patients with anal cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy were prospectively included. Planning computed tomography (CT) images were co-registered with 18F-fluorodexocyglucose (FDG) PET/CT images and T2 and diffusion weighted (DW) MR images. Three oncologists delineated the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) according to national guidelines and the visible tumor tissue (GTV <subscript>T</subscript> ). MRI and PET based delineations were evaluated by absolute volumes and Dice similarity coefficients.<br />Results: The median volume of the GTVs was 27 and 31 cm <superscript>3</superscript> for PET and MRI, respectively, while it was 6 and 11 cm <superscript>3</superscript> for GTV <subscript>T</subscript> . Both GTV and GTV <subscript>T</subscript> volumes were highly correlated between delineators (r = 0.90 and r = 0.96, respectively). The median Dice similarity coefficient was 0.75 when comparing the GTVs based on PET/CT (GTV <subscript>PET</subscript> ) with the GTVs based on MRI and CT (GTV <subscript>MRI</subscript> ). The median Dice coefficient was 0.56 when comparing the visible tumor volume evaluated by PET (GTV <subscript>T_PET</subscript> ) with the same volume evaluated by MRI (GTV <subscript>T_MRI</subscript> ). Margins of 1-2 mm in the axial plane and 7-8 mm in superoinferior direction were required for coverage of the individual observer's GTVs.<br />Conclusions: The rather good agreement between PET- and MRI-based GTVs indicates that either modality may be used for standard target delineation of anal cancer. However, larger deviations were found for GTV <subscript>T</subscript> , which may impact future tumor boost strategies.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1748-717X
Volume :
12
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Radiation oncology (London, England)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28874205
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0883-z