Back to Search
Start Over
Characterization of swallow modulation in response to bolus volume in healthy subjects accounting for catheter diameter.
- Source :
-
The Laryngoscope [Laryngoscope] 2018 Jun; Vol. 128 (6), pp. 1328-1334. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Aug 31. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Objectives/hypothesis: Characterization of the pharyngeal swallow response to volume challenges is important for swallowing function assessment. The diameter of the pressure-impedance recording catheter may influence these results. In this study, we captured key physiological swallow measures in response to bolus volume utilizing recordings acquired by two catheters of different diameter.<br />Study Design: Ten healthy adults underwent repeat investigations with 8- and 10-Fr catheters. Liquid bolus swallows of volumes 2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 30 mL were recorded. Measures indicative of distension, contractility, and flow timing were assessed.<br />Methods: Pressure-impedance recordings with pressure-flow analysis were used to capture key distension, contractility, and pressure-flow timing parameters.<br />Results: Larger bolus volumes increased upper esophageal sphincter distension diameter (P < .001) and distension pressures within the hypopharynx and upper esophageal sphincter (P < .05). Bolus flow timing measures were longer, particularly latency of bolus propulsion ahead of the pharyngeal stripping wave (P < .001). Use of a larger-diameter catheter produced higher occlusive pressures, namely upper esophageal sphincter basal pressure (P < .005) and upper esophageal sphincter postdeglutitive pressure peak (P < .001).<br />Conclusions: The bolus volume swallowed changed measurements indicative of distension pressure, luminal diameter, and pressure-flow timing; this is physiologically consistent with swallow modulation to accommodate larger, faster-flowing boluses. Additionally, catheter diameter predominantly affects lumen occlusive pressures. Appropriate physiological interpretation of the pressure-impedance recordings of pharyngeal swallowing requires consideration of the effects of volume and catheter diameter.<br />Level of Evidence: NA. Laryngoscope, 128:1328-1334, 2018.<br /> (© 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1531-4995
- Volume :
- 128
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The Laryngoscope
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 28857171
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26820