Fear of Treatments Surpasses Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors in Affecting Patients With Breast Cancer in Urban South Africa.

Purpose: Breast cancer is the most common cause of cancer in women in South Africa, and often patients present late. There is little understanding of the psychosocial stresses affecting women with breast cancer in Africa.
Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to 263 patients with breast cancer at two sites (one government and one private facility) in Johannesburg. Self-reported levels of fear were recorded on summative scales and their relationship to demographic variables assessed through univariable and multivariable modified Poisson regression.
Results: Fears related to treatments and prognosis, particularly radiation, loss of hair, and loss of breast, were far stronger than those related to socioeconomic barriers. Relative risk (RR) of most fears was higher in women younger than age 40 years, including treatment affordability (RR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.56), hair loss (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.95), and surgery (RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.68). Difficulty taking time off work predicted fear of job loss (RR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.59 to 4.21) and missing appointments because of transport (RR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.52 to 3.96) or family commitments (RR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.52 to 3.96). Women with dependents and black women were more afraid of dying (RR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.90; and RR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.33 to 2.24, respectively); however, socioeconomic status in this sample was a strong confounder of race and explained most of the racial differences in levels of fear.
Conclusion: The most significant fears around breast cancer were related to treatment modalities and adverse effects rather than transport, financial, or work concerns. Young age and job insecurity were predictive of increased fears. Education about treatments has a key role to play in improving access to breast cancer care in South Africa.
Competing Interests: The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO’s conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/jco/site/ifc. Sarah RayneConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZenecaKathryn SchnippelNo relationship to discloseCynthia FirnhaberResearch Funding: Merck (Inst)Kathryne WrightNo relationship to discloseDeirdre KrugerNo relationship to discloseCarol-Ann BennEmployment: International SOS (I) Consulting or Advisory Role: Netcare Hospital Group (Inst) Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Novartis