Comparison of the origin and coupling interval between ectopy with and without atrial fibrillation initiation.

Background: Differentiation of atrial fibrillation (AF) trigger ectopy from other ectopy is often difficult. The purpose of this study was to compare the origin and coupling intervals (CI) between AF-trigger and non-AF-trigger ectopy.
Methods: This study consisted of 120 patients with AF who underwent an initial ablation. Isoproterenol was infused up to 20μg/min to provoke ectopy and AF. We measured the CI of all ectopy provoked by an isoproterenol infusion. The %CI was calculated as the CI of the ectopy/P-P interval of the preceding 2 beats.
Results: A total of 117 patients had at least one ectopy, and AF was induced in 56 (47%) patients. Of the 276 ectopies observed in this study, 211 (76%) originated from pulmonary veins and 77 (28%) were AF-trigger ectopy. AF-trigger ectopy more frequently originated from pulmonary veins (PVs) (74 vs. 3, p<0.001) and had a significantly shorter CI (201±70ms vs. 365±147ms, p<0.001) and lower %CI (29±11% vs. 55±14%, p<0.001) than that of non-AF-trigger ectopy. A receiver operating characteristics analysis revealed that a %CI of 40% was the best cut-off value for differentiating whether it was an AF-trigger or not. The identified trigger group, including patients with provoked AF-trigger ectopy or ectopy with a low %CI (<40%), had a significantly better AF recurrence-free survival rate than the other group (88% vs. 65%, p=0.004).
Conclusions: AF-trigger ectopy predominantly originated from PVs and had a short CI. These findings may be useful for estimating whether ectopies are an AF-trigger or not.
(Copyright © 2017 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)