Back to Search
Start Over
McKenzie Method of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy was slightly more effective than placebo for pain, but not for disability, in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomised placebo controlled trial with short and longer term follow-up.
- Source :
-
British journal of sports medicine [Br J Sports Med] 2018 May; Vol. 52 (9), pp. 594-600. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jul 12. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Background: The McKenzie Method of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) is one of the exercise approaches recommended by low back pain (LBP) guidelines. We investigated the efficacy of MDT compared with placebo in patients with chronic LBP.<br />Methods: This was a prospectively registered, two-arm randomised placebo controlled trial, with a blinded assessor. A total of 148 patients seeking care for chronic LBP were randomly allocated to either MDT (n=74) or placebo (n=74). Patients from both groups received 10 treatment sessions over 5 weeks. Patients from both groups also received an educational booklet. Clinical outcomes were obtained at the end of treatment (5 weeks) and 3, 6 and 12 months after randomisation. Primary outcomes were pain intensity and disability at the end of treatment (5 weeks). We also conducted a subgroup analysis to identify potential treatment effect modifiers that could predict a better response to MDT treatment.<br />Results: The MDT group had greater improvements in pain intensity at the end of treatment (mean difference (MD) -1.00, 95% CI -2.09 to -0.01) but not for disability (MD -0.84, 95% CI -2.62 to 0.93). We did not detect between-group differences for any secondary outcomes, nor were any treatment effect modifiers identified. Patients did not report any adverse events.<br />Conclusion: We found a small and likely not clinically relevant difference in pain intensity favouring the MDT method immediately at the end of 5 weeks of treatment but not for disability. No other difference was found for any of the primary or secondary outcomes at any follow-up times.<br />Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02123394).<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: The care provider who treated patients in the MDT group has completed first level McKenzie training, however has no involvement with the McKenzie Institute. This trial did not receive neither funding from McKenzie Institute nor any assistance in writing/analysing the results of this trial. Authors do not have any involvement with the McKenzie Institute. MJH, LOPC and ANG receive funding from International Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy Research Foundation for the following studies on MDT: (1) Hancock MJ, Maher CG, Mota da Silva T, Clare H, Steffens D (2016). Secondary prevention of a recurrence of low back pain. (2) Hancock MJ, Garcia AN, Costa LdCM, Costa LOP (2014). Identifying patients with back pain who respond best to MDT. MJH is keynote speaker at the 2017 McKenzie conference and his travel costs will be paid.<br /> (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1473-0480
- Volume :
- 52
- Issue :
- 9
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- British journal of sports medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 28701365
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-097327