Back to Search Start Over

Complication Rates, Hospital Size, and Bias in the CMS Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program.

Authors :
Koenig L
Soltoff SA
Demiralp B
Demehin AA
Foster NE
Steinberg CR
Vaz C
Wetzel S
Xu S
Source :
American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality [Am J Med Qual] 2017 Nov/Dec; Vol. 32 (6), pp. 611-616. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Dec 19.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

In 2016, Medicare's Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HAC-RP) will reduce hospital payments by $364 million. Although observers have questioned the validity of certain HAC-RP measures, less attention has been paid to the determination of low-performing hospitals (bottom quartile) and the assignment of penalties. This study investigated possible bias in the HAC-RP by simulating hospitals' likelihood of being in the worst-performing quartile for 8 patient safety measures, assuming identical expected complication rates across hospitals. Simulated likelihood of being a poor performer varied with hospital size. This relationship depended on the measure's complication rate. For 3 of 8 measures examined, the equal-quality simulation identified poor performers similarly to empirical data (c-statistic approximately 0.7 or higher) and explained most of the variation in empirical performance by size (Efron's R <superscript>2</superscript> > 0.85). The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services could address potential bias in the HAC-RP by stratifying by hospital size or using a broader "all-harm" measure.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1555-824X
Volume :
32
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28693333
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860616681840