Back to Search Start Over

Use of HOMA-IR to diagnose non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a population-based and inter-laboratory study.

Authors :
Isokuortti E
Zhou Y
Peltonen M
Bugianesi E
Clement K
Bonnefont-Rousselot D
Lacorte JM
Gastaldelli A
Schuppan D
Schattenberg JM
Hakkarainen A
Lundbom N
Jousilahti P
Männistö S
Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S
Saltevo J
Anstee QM
Yki-Järvinen H
Source :
Diabetologia [Diabetologia] 2017 Oct; Vol. 60 (10), pp. 1873-1882. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jun 29.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Recent European guidelines for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) call for reference values for HOMA-IR. In this study, we aimed to determine: (1) the upper limit of normal HOMA-IR in two population-based cohorts; (2) the HOMA-IR corresponding to NAFLD; (3) the effect of sex and PNPLA3 genotype at rs738409 on HOMA-IR; and (4) inter-laboratory variations in HOMA-IR.<br />Methods: We identified healthy individuals in two population-based cohorts (FINRISK 2007 [n = 5024] and the Programme for Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes in Finland [FIN-D2D; n = 2849]) to define the upper 95th percentile of HOMA-IR. Non-obese individuals with normal fasting glucose levels, no excessive alcohol use, no known diseases and no use of any drugs were considered healthy. The optimal HOMA-IR cut-off for NAFLD (liver fat ≥5.56%, based on the Dallas Heart Study) was determined in 368 non-diabetic individuals (35% with NAFLD), whose liver fat was measured using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ( <superscript>1</superscript> H-MRS). Samples from ten individuals were simultaneously analysed for HOMA-IR in seven European laboratories.<br />Results: The upper 95th percentiles of HOMA-IR were 1.9 and 2.0 in healthy individuals in the FINRISK (n = 1167) and FIN-D2D (n = 459) cohorts. Sex or PNPLA3 genotype did not influence these values. The optimal HOMA-IR cut-off for NAFLD was 1.9 (sensitivity 87%, specificity 79%). A HOMA-IR of 2.0 corresponded to normal liver fat (<5.56% on <superscript>1</superscript> H-MRS) in linear regression analysis. The 2.0 HOMA-IR measured in Helsinki corresponded to 1.3, 1.6, 1.8, 1.8, 2.0 and 2.1 in six other laboratories. The inter-laboratory CV% of HOMA-IR was 25% due to inter-assay variation in insulin (25%) rather than glucose (5%) measurements.<br />Conclusions/interpretation: The upper limit of HOMA-IR in population-based cohorts closely corresponds to that of normal liver fat. Standardisation of insulin assays would be the first step towards definition of normal values for HOMA-IR.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1432-0428
Volume :
60
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Diabetologia
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28660493
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-017-4340-1