Back to Search Start Over

A Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Learning Curves and Competence in Endoscopic Ultrasound and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Among Advanced Endoscopy Trainees: The Rapid Assessment of Trainee Endoscopy Skills Study.

Authors :
Wani S
Keswani R
Hall M
Han S
Ali MA
Brauer B
Carlin L
Chak A
Collins D
Cote GA
Diehl DL
DiMaio CJ
Dries A
El-Hajj I
Ellert S
Fairley K
Faulx A
Fujii-Lau L
Gaddam S
Gan SI
Gaspar JP
Gautamy C
Gordon S
Harris C
Hyder S
Jones R
Kim S
Komanduri S
Law R
Lee L
Mounzer R
Mullady D
Muthusamy VR
Olyaee M
Pfau P
Saligram S
Piraka C
Rastogi A
Rosenkranz L
Rzouq F
Saxena A
Shah RJ
Simon VC
Small A
Sreenarasimhaiah J
Walker A
Wang AY
Watson RR
Wilson RH
Yachimski P
Yang D
Edmundowicz S
Early DS
Source :
Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association [Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol] 2017 Nov; Vol. 15 (11), pp. 1758-1767.e11. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jun 16.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Background & Aims: On the basis of the Next Accreditation System, trainee assessment should occur on a continuous basis with individualized feedback. We aimed to validate endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) learning curves among advanced endoscopy trainees (AETs) by using a large national sample of training programs and to develop a centralized database that allows assessment of performance in relation to peers.<br />Methods: ASGE recognized training programs were invited to participate, and AETs were graded on ERCP and EUS exams by using a validated competency assessment tool that assesses technical and cognitive competence in a continuous fashion. Grading for each skill was done by using a 4-point scoring system, and a comprehensive data collection and reporting system was built to create learning curves by using cumulative sum analysis. Individual results and benchmarking to peers were shared with AETs and trainers quarterly.<br />Results: Of the 62 programs invited, 20 programs and 22 AETs participated in this study. At the end of training, median number of EUS and ERCP performed/AET was 300 (range, 155-650) and 350 (125-500), respectively. Overall, 3786 exams were graded (EUS, 1137; ERCP-biliary, 2280; ERCP-pancreatic, 369). Learning curves for individual end points and overall technical/cognitive aspects in EUS and ERCP demonstrated substantial variability and were successfully shared with all programs. The majority of trainees achieved overall technical (EUS, 82%; ERCP, 60%) and cognitive (EUS, 76%; ERCP, 100%) competence at conclusion of training.<br />Conclusions: These results demonstrate the feasibility of establishing a centralized database to report individualized learning curves and confirm the substantial variability in time to achieve competence among AETs in EUS and ERCP. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02509416.<br /> (Copyright © 2017 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1542-7714
Volume :
15
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28625816
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.012