Back to Search Start Over

Immediate and Short-Term Effects of Kinesio Taping Tightness in Mechanical Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors :
Velasco-Roldán O
Riquelme I
Ferragut-Garcías A
Heredia-Rizo AM
Rodríguez-Blanco C
Oliva-Pascual-Vaca Á
Source :
PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation [PM R] 2018 Jan; Vol. 10 (1), pp. 28-35. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jun 08.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: There is controversy regarding the best technique for applying Kinesio Taping (KT), and the theory supporting that skin convolutions may explain its efficacy has recently been challenged.<br />Objective: To compare the immediate and short-term effectiveness of KT tightness on mechanosensitivity and spinal mobility in nonspecific low back pain (LBP), and to observe the influence of gender in the outcome measures.<br />Design: Double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.<br />Setting: University-based clinical research center.<br />Participants: A total of 75 individuals with a mean age of 33 years (±7.4 years), 60% female and 40% male, with nonspecific LBP were recruited and randomly assigned to 1 of the following study groups: standard KT tension (n = 26), increased KT tension (n = 25), and no KT tension (n = 24).<br />Interventions: All participants received a two I-strip taping over the paravertebral muscles for 24 hours. Paper-off tension (15%-25% of the available stretch) was used in the standard KT group, which was increased to 40% in the increased KT tension group. The rest of participants received a taping procedure with no KT tension. Measurements were taken at baseline, immediately after the taping, 24 hours after the taping, and after KT removal.<br />Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome included pressure pain thresholds over the erector spinae and gluteus medius muscles. The secondary outcome was lumbar mobility (assessed with a digital inclinometer, and back-saver sit-and-reach, finger-to-floor, and sit-and-reach tests).<br />Results: In the between-groups analysis of the mean score changes after baseline assessment, no significant differences were found for any of the outcome measures (P > .05) except the left back-saver sit-and-reach test (P = .03). A statistically significant interaction group × gender × time was observed only for mechanosensitivity values (P = .02 for the gluteus and P = .01 for the erector spinae).<br />Conclusion: KT tightness does not seem to influence pain sensitivity and lumbar mobility in chronic LBP in either the immediate or short term.<br />Level of Evidence: II.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1934-1563
Volume :
10
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28602935
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.05.003