Back to Search
Start Over
Efficacy and safety of left atrial appendage closure with WATCHMAN in patients with or without contraindication to oral anticoagulation: 1-Year follow-up outcome data of the EWOLUTION trial.
- Source :
-
Heart rhythm [Heart Rhythm] 2017 Sep; Vol. 14 (9), pp. 1302-1308. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 May 31. - Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Background: Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion with WATCHMAN has emerged as viable alternative to vitamin K antagonists in randomized controlled trials.<br />Objective: EWOLUTION was designed to provide data in routine practice from a prospective multicenter registry.<br />Methods: A total of 1025 patients scheduled for a WATCHMAN implant were prospectively and sequentially enrolled at 47 centers. Indication for LAA closure was based on European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Follow-up and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) were performed per local practice.<br />Results: The baseline CHA <subscript>2</subscript> DS <subscript>2</subscript> -VASc score was 4.5 ± 1.6; the mean age was 73.4 ± 9 years; previous transient ischemic attack/ischemic stroke was present in 312 (30.5%), 155 (15.1%) had previous hemorrhagic stroke, and 320 (31.3%) had a history of major bleeding; and 750 (73%) were deemed unsuitable for oral anticoagulation therapy. WATCHMAN implant succeeded in 1005 (98.5%) of patients, without leaks >5 mm in 1002 (99.7%) with at least 1 TEE follow-up in 875 patients (87%). Antiplatelet therapy was used in 784 (83%), while vitamin K antagonists were used in only 75 (8%). At 1 year, mortality was 98 (9.8%), reflecting the advanced age and comorbidities in this population. Device thrombus was observed in 28 patients at routine TEE (3.7%) and was not correlated with the drug regimen (P = .14). Ischemic stroke rate was 1.1% (relative risk 84% vs estimated historical data); the major bleeding rate was 2.6% and was predominantly (2.3%) nonprocedure/device related.<br />Conclusion: LAA closure with the WATCHMAN device has a high implant and sealing success. This method of stroke risk reduction appears to be safe and effective with an ischemic stroke rate as low as 1.1%, even though 73% of patients had a contraindication to and were not using oral anticoagulation.<br /> (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Administration, Oral
Aged
Atrial Appendage diagnostic imaging
Atrial Appendage physiopathology
Atrial Fibrillation diagnosis
Atrial Fibrillation physiopathology
Brain Ischemia diagnosis
Brain Ischemia etiology
Cause of Death trends
Contraindications, Drug
Europe epidemiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Incidence
Male
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Survival Rate trends
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
United States epidemiology
Anticoagulants administration & dosage
Atrial Appendage surgery
Atrial Fibrillation surgery
Brain Ischemia prevention & control
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1556-3871
- Volume :
- 14
- Issue :
- 9
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Heart rhythm
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 28577840
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.038