Back to Search Start Over

Sensitivity of mean canopy stomatal conductance to vapor pressure deficit in a flooded Taxodium distichum L. forest: hydraulic and non-hydraulic effects.

Authors :
Oren R
Sperry JS
Ewers BE
Pataki DE
Phillips N
Megonigal JP
Source :
Oecologia [Oecologia] 2001 Jan; Vol. 126 (1), pp. 21-29. Date of Electronic Publication: 2001 Jan 01.
Publication Year :
2001

Abstract

We measured the xylem sap flux in 64-year-old Taxodium distichum (L.) Richard trees growing in a flooded forest using Granier-type sensors to estimate mean canopy stomatal conductance of the stand (G <subscript>S</subscript> ). Temporal variations in G <subscript>S</subscript> were investigated in relation to variation in vapor pressure deficit (D), photosynthetic photon flux density (Q <subscript>o</subscript> ), and the transpiration rate per unit of leaf area (E <subscript>L</subscript> ), the latter variable serving as a proxy for plant water potential. We found that G <subscript>S</subscript> was only weakly related to Q <subscript>o</subscript> below 500 µmol m <superscript>-2</superscript> s <superscript>-1</superscript> (r <superscript>2</superscript> =0.29), but unrelated to Q <subscript>o</subscript> above this value. Above Q <subscript>o</subscript> =500 µmol m <superscript>-2</superscript> s <superscript>-1</superscript> and D=0.6 kPa, G <subscript>S</subscript> decreased linearly with increasing E <subscript>L</subscript> with a poor fit (r <superscript>2</superscript> =0.31), and linearly with lnD with a much better fit (r <superscript>2</superscript> =0.81). The decrease of G <subscript>S</subscript> with lnD was at a rate predicted based on a simple hydraulic model in which stomata regulate the minimum leaf water potential. Based on the hydraulic model, stomatal sensitivity to D is proportional to stomatal conductance at low D. A hurricane caused an ~41% reduction in leaf area. This resulted in a 28% increase in G <subscript>S</subscript> at D=1 kPa (G <subscript>Sref</subscript> ), indicating only partial compensation. As predicted, the increase in G <subscript>Sref</subscript> after the hurricane was accompanied by a similar increase in stomatal sensitivity to D (29%). At night, G <subscript>Sref</subscript> was ~20% of the daytime value under non-limiting light (Q <subscript>o</subscript> >500 µmol m <superscript>-2</superscript> s <superscript>-1</superscript> ). However, stomatal sensitivity to D decreased only to ~46% (both reductions referenced to pre-hurricane daytime values), thus having more than twice the sensitivity expected based on hydraulic considerations alone. Therefore, non-hydraulic processes must cause heightened nighttime stomatal sensitivity to D.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1432-1939
Volume :
126
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Oecologia
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28547434
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420000497