Back to Search Start Over

Costs and cost-efficacy analysis of the 2017 GESIDA/Spanish National AIDS Plan recommended guidelines for initial antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected adults.

Authors :
Rivero A
Pérez-Molina JA
Blasco AJ
Arribas JR
Asensi V
Crespo M
Domingo P
Iribarren JA
Lázaro P
López-Aldeguer J
Lozano F
Martínez E
Moreno S
Palacios R
Pineda JA
Pulido F
Rubio R
Santos J
de la Torre J
Tuset M
Gatell JM
Source :
Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.) [Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed)] 2018 May; Vol. 36 (5), pp. 268-276. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 May 19.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Introduction: GESIDA and the Spanish National AIDS Plan panel of experts have recommended preferred (PR), alternative (AR) and other regimens (OR) for antiretroviral therapy (ART) as initial therapy in HIV-infected patients for 2017. The objective of this study was to evaluate the costs and the efficiency of initiating treatment with PR and AR.<br />Methods: Economic assessment of costs and efficiency (cost-efficacy) based on decision tree analyses. Efficacy was defined as the probability of reporting a viral load <50copies/mL at week 48, in an intention-to-treat analysis. Cost of initiating treatment with an ART regimen was defined as the costs of ART and its consequences (adverse effects, changes of ART regimen and drug resistance studies) during the first 48 weeks. The payer perspective (National Health System) was applied considering only differential direct costs: ART (official prices), management of adverse effects, resistance studies and HLA B*5701 screening. The setting was Spain and the costs correspond to those of 2017. A deterministic sensitivity analysis was conducted, building three scenarios for each regimen: base case, most favourable and least favourable.<br />Results: In the base case scenario, the cost of initiating treatment ranged from 6882 euro for TFV/FTC/RPV (AR) to 10,904 euros for TFV/FTC+RAL (PR). The efficacy varied from 0.82 for TFV/FTC+DRV/p (AR) to 0.92 for TAF/FTC/EVG/COBI (PR). The efficiency, in terms of cost-efficacy, ranged from 7923 to 12,765 euros per responder at 48 weeks, for ABC/3TC/DTG (PR) and TFV/FTC+RAL (PR), respectively.<br />Conclusion: Considering ART official prices, the most efficient regimen was ABC/3TC/DTG (PR), followed by TFV/FTC/RPV (AR) and TAF/FTC/EVG/COBI (PR).<br /> (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English; Spanish; Castilian
ISSN :
2529-993X
Volume :
36
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28532596
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2017.04.002