Back to Search Start Over

The use of mid-infrared spectrometry to estimate the ration composition of lactating dairy cows.

Authors :
Klaffenböck M
Steinwidder A
Fasching C
Terler G
Gruber L
Mészáros G
Sölkner J
Source :
Journal of dairy science [J Dairy Sci] 2017 Jul; Vol. 100 (7), pp. 5411-5421. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 May 17.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

The composition of cow milk is strongly affected by the feeding regimen. Because milk components are routinely determined using mid-infrared (MIR) spectrometry, MIR spectra could also be used to estimate an animal's ration composition. The objective of this study was to determine whether and how well amounts of dry matter intake and the proportions of concentrates, hay, grass silage, maize silage, and pasture in the total ration can be estimated using MIR spectra at an individual animal level. A total of 10,200 milk samples and sets of feed intake data were collected from 90 dairy cows at 2 experimental farms of the Agricultural Research and Education Centre in Raumberg-Gumpenstein, Austria. For each run of analysis, the data set was split into a calibration and a validation data set in a 40:60 ratio. Estimated ration compositions were calculated using a partial least squares regression and then compared with the respective observed ration compositions. In separate analyses, the factors milk yield and concentrate intake were included as additional predictors. To evaluate accuracy, the coefficient of determination (R <superscript>2</superscript> ) and ratio to performance deviation were used. The highest R <superscript>2</superscript> values (for kg of dry matter intake/for % of ration) for the individual feedstuffs were as follows: pasture, 0.63/0.66; grass silage, 0.32/0.43; concentrate intake, 0.39/0.34; maize silage, 0.32/0.33; and hay, 0.15/0.16. Estimation of groups of feedstuffs (forages, energy-dense feedstuffs) mostly resulted in R <superscript>2</superscript> values >0.50. Including the parameters milk yield or concentrate intake improved R <superscript>2</superscript> values by up to 0.21, with an average improvement of 0.04. The results of this study indicate that not all ration components may be estimated equally accurately. Even if some estimates are good on average, there may be strong deviations between estimated and observed values in individual data sets, and therefore individual estimates should not be overemphasized. Further research including pooled samples (e.g., bulk milk, farm samples) or variations in ration composition is called for.<br /> (Copyright © 2017 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1525-3198
Volume :
100
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of dairy science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28527795
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12189