Back to Search Start Over

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium versus azathioprine in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors :
Ordi-Ros J
Sáez-Comet L
Pérez-Conesa M
Vidal X
Mitjavila F
Castro Salomó A
Cuquet Pedragosa J
Ortiz-Santamaria V
Mauri Plana M
Cortés-Hernández J
Source :
Annals of the rheumatic diseases [Ann Rheum Dis] 2017 Sep; Vol. 76 (9), pp. 1575-1582. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Apr 27.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) versus azathioprine (AZA) in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease.<br />Methods: A multicentre, 24-month, superiority, open-label, randomised controlled trial (NCT01112215) was conducted with 240 patients (120 per arm) receiving either EC-MPS (target dose: 1440 mg/day) or AZA (target dose: 2 mg/kg/day) in addition to prednisone and/or antimalarials. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving clinical remission, assessed by SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG), at 3 and 24 months. Secondary endpoints included time to clinical remission, BILAG A and B flare rates, time to flare, corticosteroid reduction and adverse events (AEs).<br />Results: Proportion of patients achieving clinical remission (clinical SLEDAI=0) was higher in the EC-MPS group at 3 (32.5% vs 19.2%; treatment difference, 13.3 (CI 2.3 to 24), p=0.034) and 24 months (71.2% vs 48.3%; treatment difference, 22.9 (CI 10.4 to 34.4), p<0.001). EC-MPS was superior with respect to time to clinical remission (HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.91; p=0.017). BILAG A/B and B flares occurred more frequently in the AZA group (71.7% vs 50%, p=0.001 and 21.67% vs 8.3%, p=0.004, respectively). EC-MPS was superior with respect to time to first BILAG A/B (HR 1.81; 95% CI 1.3 to 2.56; p=0.0004) and BILAG A flare (HR 2.84; 95% CI 1.37 to 5.89; p=0.003). AEs were similar in both groups except for leucopenia that occurred more frequently with AZA.<br />Conclusions: EC-MPS was superior to AZA in treating SLE and preventing further relapses.<br />Trial Registration Number: NCT01112215; Results.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.<br /> (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1468-2060
Volume :
76
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annals of the rheumatic diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28450313
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210882