Back to Search Start Over

Routine Use of Contrast Swallow After Total Gastrectomy and Esophagectomy: Is it Justified?

Authors :
El-Sourani N
Bruns H
Troja A
Raab HR
Antolovic D
Source :
Polish journal of radiology [Pol J Radiol] 2017 Mar 28; Vol. 82, pp. 170-173. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Mar 28 (Print Publication: 2017).
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Background: After gastrectomy or esophagectomy, esophagogastrostomy and esophagojejunostomy are commonly used for reconstruction. Water-soluble contrast swallow is often used as a routine screening to exclude anastomotic leakage during the first postoperative week. In this retrospective study, the sensitivity and specificity of oral water-soluble contrast swallow for the detection of anastomotic leakage and its clinical symptoms were analysed.<br />Material/methods: Records of 104 consecutive total gastrectomies and distal esophagectomies were analysed. In all cases, upper gastrointestinal contrast swallow with the use of a water-soluble contrast agent was performed on the 5 <superscript>th</superscript> postoperative day. Extravasation of the contrast agent was defined as anastomotic leakage. When anastomotic insufficiency was suspected but no extravasation was present, a computed tomography (CT) scan and upper endoscopy were performed.<br />Results: Oral contrast swallow detected 7 anastomotic leaks. Based on CT-scans and upper endoscopy, the true number of anastomotic leakage was 15. The findings of the oral contrast swallow were falsely positive in 4 and falsely negative in 12 patients, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the oral contrast swallow was 20% and 96%, respectively.<br />Conclusions: Routine radiological contrast swallow following total gastrectomy or distal esophagectomy cannot be recommended. When symptoms of anastomotic leakage are present, a CT-scan and endoscopy are currently the methods of choice.<br />Competing Interests: Statement There is no conflict of interest. There was no funding of this original research. An ethical approval was not required.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1733-134X
Volume :
82
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Polish journal of radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28392855
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.12659/PJR.899951