Back to Search Start Over

Proximal translation of > 1 mm within the first two years of revision total hip arthroplasty correctly predicts whether or not an acetabular component is loose in 80% of cases: a case-control study with confirmed intra-operative outcomes.

Authors :
Kim YS
Abrahams JM
Callary SA
De Ieso C
Costi K
Howie DW
Solomon LB
Source :
The bone & joint journal [Bone Joint J] 2017 Apr; Vol. 99-B (4), pp. 465-474.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Aims: The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of previously reported thresholds of proximal translation and sagittal rotation of cementless acetabular components used for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) at various times during early follow-up.<br />Patients and Methods: Migration of cementless acetabular components was measured retrospectively in 84 patients (94 components) using Ein-Bild-Rontgen-Analyse (EBRA-Cup) in two groups of patients. In Group A, components were recorded as not being loose intra-operatively at re-revision THA (52 components/48 patients) and Group B components were recorded to be loose at re-revision (42 components/36 patients).<br />Results: The mean proximal translation and sagittal rotation were significantly higher in Group B than in Group A from three months onwards (p < 0.02). Proximal translation > 1.0 mm within 24 months had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 90% and a specificity of 94%, but a sensitivity of 64%. Proximal translation > 1.0 mm within the first 24 months correctly identified 76 of 94 (81%) of components to be either loose or not loose. However, ten components in Group B (24%) did not migrate proximally above 1.0 mm within the first 60 months.<br />Conclusion: The high PPV of EBRA-Cup measurements of proximal translation (90%) shows that this can be used in early follow-up to identify patients at risk of aseptic loosening. The absence of proximal translation within the first 60 months indicates a component is not likely to be loose at re-revision THA although it does not exclude late aseptic loosening as a cause of failure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:465-74.<br /> (©2017 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2049-4408
Volume :
99-B
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The bone & joint journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28385935
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-0805.R1