Back to Search
Start Over
Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Guidelines: Interprofessional Perspectives to Translate the Evidence.
- Source :
-
Dimensions of critical care nursing : DCCN [Dimens Crit Care Nurs] 2017 May/Jun; Vol. 36 (3), pp. 164-173. - Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Background: Societal guidelines exist for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium (PAD) in critically ill patients. This contemporary practice aims for a more awake and interactive patient. Institutions are challenged to translate the interrelated multivariable concepts of PAD into daily clinical practice and to demonstrate improvement in quality outcomes. An interdisciplinary goal-directed approach shows outcomes in high-acuity surgical critical care during the early stages of implementation.<br />Methods: This study was a prospective preintervention and postintervention design. A formal PAD clinical practice guideline targeting standardized assessment and "light" levels of sedation was instituted. All mechanically ventilated patients admitted to a 24-bed surgical intensive care unit (ICU) at an academic medical center during a 6-month period were included (3 months before and 3 months after implementation). Sedation and agitation were measured using the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS), pain measured using a Behavioral or Numeric Pain Scale (NPS/BPS), and delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit. Total ventilator days with exposure to continuous opioid or sedative infusions and total ICU days where the patient received a physical activity session exercising out of bed were recorded.<br />Results: There were 106 patients (54 at preintervention and 52 at postintervention). Mean percentage of RASS scores between 0 to -1 increased from 38% to 50% postintervention (P < .02). Mean percentage of NPS/BPS scores within the goal range (<5 for BPS and <3 for NPS) remained stable, 86% to 83% (P = .16). There was a decrease in use of continuous narcotic infusions for mechanically ventilated patients. This was reported as mean percentage of total ventilator days with a continuous opioid infusing: 65% before implementation versus 47% after implementation (P < .01). Mean percentage of ICU days with physical activity sessions increased from 24% to 41% (P < .001). Overall mean ventilator-free days and ICU length of stay were 5.4 to 4.5 days (P = .29) and 11.75 to 9.5 days (P = .20), respectively.<br />Conclusion: Measureable patient outcomes are achievable in the early stages of PAD guideline initiatives and can inform future systems-level organizational change. Pain, agitation, and delirium assessment tools form the foundation for clinical implementation and evaluation. High-acuity surgical critical care patients can achieve more time at goal RASS, decreased ventilator days, and less exposure to continuous opioid infusions, all while maintaining stable analgesia.
- Subjects :
- Female
Guideline Adherence
Humans
Intensive Care Units
Length of Stay statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prospective Studies
Respiration, Artificial
Analgesics, Opioid therapeutic use
Delirium drug therapy
Drug Utilization statistics & numerical data
Hypnotics and Sedatives therapeutic use
Pain drug therapy
Psychomotor Agitation drug therapy
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1538-8646
- Volume :
- 36
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Dimensions of critical care nursing : DCCN
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 28375992
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000239