Back to Search Start Over

Don't forget to look down - collaborative approaches to predator conservation.

Authors :
Redpath SM
Linnell JDC
Festa-Bianchet M
Boitani L
Bunnefeld N
Dickman A
Gutiérrez RJ
Irvine RJ
Johansson M
Majić A
McMahon BJ
Pooley S
Sandström C
Sjölander-Lindqvist A
Skogen K
Swenson JE
Trouwborst A
Young J
Milner-Gulland EJ
Source :
Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society [Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc] 2017 Nov; Vol. 92 (4), pp. 2157-2163. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Mar 24.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Finding effective ways of conserving large carnivores is widely recognised as a priority in conservation. However, there is disagreement about the most effective way to do this, with some favouring top-down 'command and control' approaches and others favouring collaboration. Arguments for coercive top-down approaches have been presented elsewhere; here we present arguments for collaboration. In many parts of the developed world, flexibility of approach is built into the legislation, so that conservation objectives are balanced with other legitimate goals. In the developing world, limited resources, poverty and weak governance mean that collaborative approaches are likely to play a particularly important part in carnivore conservation. In general, coercive policies may lead to the deterioration of political legitimacy and potentially to non-compliance issues such as illegal killing, whereas collaborative approaches may lead to psychological ownership, enhanced trust, learning, and better social outcomes. Sustainable hunting/trapping plays a crucial part in the conservation and management of many large carnivores. There are many different models for how to conserve carnivores effectively across the world, research is now required to reduce uncertainty and examine the effectiveness of these approaches in different contexts.<br /> (© 2017 Cambridge Philosophical Society.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1469-185X
Volume :
92
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28338282
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12326