Back to Search
Start Over
Outcomes of fenestrated and branched endovascular repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.
- Source :
-
Journal of vascular surgery [J Vasc Surg] 2017 Sep; Vol. 66 (3), pp. 687-694. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Mar 01. - Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Background: More than 80% of infrarenal aortic aneurysms are treated by endovascular repair. However, adoption of fenestrated and branched endovascular repair for complex aortic aneurysms has been limited, despite high morbidity and mortality associated with open repair. There are few published reports of consecutive outcomes, inclusive of all fenestrated and branched endovascular repairs, starting from the inception of a complex aortic aneurysm program. Therefore, we examined a single center's consecutive experience of fenestrated and branched endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms.<br />Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, observational cohort study evaluating 30-day and 1-year outcomes in all consecutive patients who underwent fenestrated and branched endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms (definition: requiring one or more fenestrations or branches). Data were collected prospectively through an Institutional Review Board-approved registry and a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption clinical trial (G130210).<br />Results: We performed 100 consecutive complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs (November 2010 to March 2016) using 58 (58%) commercially manufactured custom-made devices and 42 (42%) physician-modified devices to treat 4 (4%) common iliac, 42 (42%) juxtarenal, 18 (18%) pararenal, and 36 (36%) thoracoabdominal aneurysms (type I, n = 1; type II, n = 4; type III, n = 12; type IV, n = 18; arch, n = 1). The repairs included 309 fenestrations, branches, and scallops (average of 3.1 branch arteries/case). All patients had 30-day follow-up for 30-day event rates: three (3%) deaths; six (6%) target artery occlusions; five (5%) progressions to dialysis; eight (8%) access complications; one (1%) paraparesis; one (1%) bowel ischemia; and no instances of myocardial infarction, paralysis, or stroke. Of 10 type I or type III endoleaks, 8 resolved (7 with secondary intervention, 1 without intervention). Mean follow-up time was 563 days (interquartile range, 156-862), with three (3%) patients lost to follow-up. On 1-year Kaplan-Meier analysis, survival was 87%, freedom from type I or type III endoleak was 97%, target vessel patency was 92%, and freedom from aortic rupture was 100%. Average lengths of intensive care unit stay and inpatient stay were 1.4 days (standard deviation, 3.3) and 3.6 days (standard deviation, 3.6), respectively.<br />Conclusions: These results show that complex aortic aneurysms can now be treated with minimally invasive fenestrated and branched endovascular repair. Endovascular technologies will likely continue to play an increasingly important role in the management of patients with complex aortic aneurysm disease.<br /> (Copyright © 2017 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal diagnostic imaging
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal mortality
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic diagnostic imaging
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic mortality
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation mortality
Clinical Trials as Topic
Disease-Free Survival
Endovascular Procedures adverse effects
Endovascular Procedures mortality
Female
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Massachusetts
Postoperative Complications etiology
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Registries
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal surgery
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic surgery
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation instrumentation
Endovascular Procedures instrumentation
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1097-6809
- Volume :
- 66
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of vascular surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 28259577
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2016.12.111