Back to Search Start Over

Changes in agonist neural drive, hypertrophy and pre-training strength all contribute to the individual strength gains after resistance training.

Authors :
Balshaw TG
Massey GJ
Maden-Wilkinson TM
Morales-Artacho AJ
McKeown A
Appleby CL
Folland JP
Source :
European journal of applied physiology [Eur J Appl Physiol] 2017 Apr; Vol. 117 (4), pp. 631-640. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Feb 26.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Purpose: Whilst neural and morphological adaptations following resistance training (RT) have been investigated extensively at a group level, relatively little is known about the contribution of specific physiological mechanisms, or pre-training strength, to the individual changes in strength following training. This study investigated the contribution of multiple underpinning neural [agonist EMG (QEMG <subscript>MVT</subscript> ), antagonist EMG (HEMG <subscript>ANTAG</subscript> )] and morphological variables [total quadriceps volume (QUADS <subscript>VOL</subscript> ), and muscle fascicle pennation angle (QUADSθ <subscript>p</subscript> )], as well as pre-training strength, to the individual changes in strength after 12 weeks of knee extensor RT.<br />Methods: Twenty-eight healthy young men completed 12 weeks of isometric knee extensor RT (3/week). Isometric maximum voluntary torque (MVT) was assessed pre- and post-RT, as were simultaneous neural drive to the agonist (QEMG <subscript>MVT</subscript> ) and antagonist (HEMG <subscript>ANTAG</subscript> ). In addition QUADS <subscript>VOL</subscript> was determined with MRI and QUADSθ <subscript>p</subscript> with B-mode ultrasound.<br />Results: Percentage changes (∆) in MVT were correlated to ∆QEMG <subscript>MVT</subscript> (r = 0.576, P = 0.001), ∆QUADS <subscript>VOL</subscript> (r = 0.461, P = 0.014), and pre-training MVT (r = -0.429, P = 0.023), but not ∆HEMG <subscript>ANTAG</subscript> (r = 0.298, P = 0.123) or ∆QUADSθ <subscript>p</subscript> (r = -0.207, P = 0.291). Multiple regression analysis revealed 59.9% of the total variance in ∆MVT after RT to be explained by ∆QEMG <subscript>MVT</subscript> (30.6%), ∆QUADS <subscript>VOL</subscript> (18.7%), and pre-training MVT (10.6%).<br />Conclusions: Changes in agonist neural drive, quadriceps muscle volume and pre-training strength combined to explain the majority of the variance in strength changes after knee extensor RT (~60%) and adaptations in agonist neural drive were the most important single predictor during this short-term intervention.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1439-6327
Volume :
117
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of applied physiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28239775
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3560-x