Back to Search
Start Over
Phase I/II study of tecemotide as immunotherapy in Japanese patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer.
- Source :
-
Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) [Lung Cancer] 2017 Mar; Vol. 105, pp. 23-30. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jan 17. - Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Objectives: Unresectable stage III NSCLC (non-small cell lung cancer) confers a poor prognosis and interest is growing in the use of immunotherapy to improve outcomes for patients with this disease. We investigated the safety and efficacy of maintenance tecemotide, a mucin 1 (MUC1)-specific agent that induces T-cell responses to MUC1, versus placebo in Japanese patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC and no disease progression after primary chemoradiotherapy.<br />Materials and Methods: Patients aged ≥20 years with unresectable stage III NSCLC, stable disease or clinical response after primary chemoradiotherapy and performance status ≤1, were recruited across 25 centers in Japan. Patients were randomized 2:1 to tecemotide (930μg as lipopeptide) or placebo subcutaneously once weekly for 8 weeks, then every 6 weeks until disease progression or treatment withdrawal. Cyclophosphamide 300mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> (maximum dose 600mg) was given intravenously 3days before the first dose of tecemotide. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, time to progression, time to treatment failure and safety.<br />Results: The intent-to-treat population comprised 172 patients; 114 received tecemotide and 58 placebo. Baseline characteristics were comparable between treatment arms. Most patients (94%) received primary concurrent chemoradiotherapy. There was no apparent trend toward increased OS time with tecemotide over placebo (median 32.4 versus 32.2 months, hazard ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.61-1.48; P=0.83). No improvements in secondary efficacy endpoints were observed. The frequency of treatment-related adverse events was similar, and serious adverse event rates were the same in both arms. There were no new safety signals.<br />Conclusions: These results do not support those from a randomized phase III study (START) of improved OS with tecemotide in the subgroup of patients treated with primary concurrent chemoradiotherapy.<br /> (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use
Cancer Vaccines therapeutic use
Cyclophosphamide therapeutic use
Double-Blind Method
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Humans
Immunotherapy methods
Japan
Male
Membrane Glycoproteins therapeutic use
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration & dosage
Cancer Vaccines administration & dosage
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung drug therapy
Cyclophosphamide administration & dosage
Lung Neoplasms drug therapy
Membrane Glycoproteins administration & dosage
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1872-8332
- Volume :
- 105
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 28236981
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.01.007