Back to Search
Start Over
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy among patients with non-ischaemic vs. ischaemic cardiomyopathy for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death.
- Source :
-
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology [Europace] 2018 Jan 01; Vol. 20 (1), pp. 65-72. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Aim: The magnitude of benefit related to implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) has not been evaluated extensively in clinical practice.<br />Methods and Results: Of the 5539 consecutive patients enrolled in the multicentre Défibrillateur Automatique Implantable-Prévention Primaire (DAI-PP) study (2002-12), 5485 patients (with information on underlying heart disease) were included in the present analysis: 2181 (39.8%) had NICM and 3304 (60.2%) had ICM. ICM patients were older (63.7 ±10.3 vs. 60.6 ± 12.2 years, P < 0.0001), with a higher ejection fraction [27% (25-30) vs. 25% (20-30), P < 0.0001], narrower QRS (37.3% vs. 21.4% with QRS <120, P < 0.0001), and higher prevalence of sinus rhythm (77.3% vs. 74.0%, P = 0.009). During a mean follow-up of 3.1 ± 2.2 years, 814 patients died, giving a mortality incidence of 48.6 per 1000 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI) 45.2-51.9], higher among ICM patients (52.3, 95% CI 47.8-56.7) than in NICM patients (42.4, 95% CI 37.3-47.6; P = 0.008) (adjusted hazard ratio 1.31, 95% CI 1.06-1.61, P = 0.01). The increase in mortality among ICM patients was mainly due to non-cardiovascular mortality (P = 0.0002), whereas incidences of cardiovascular mortality (including ICD-unresponsive SCD) were similar in the two groups. Incidences of appropriate ICD interventions (anti-tachycardia pacing, shocks) were similar, but inappropriate therapies were more frequent in NICM (7.94 vs. 5.96%; P = 0.005).<br />Conclusion: NICM and ICM patients had a same rate of ICD therapy for primary prevention of SCD in everyday practice. But, ICM patients more often died of a non- cardiovascular cause of death.<br />Clinical Trial Registration: NCT 01992458.<br /> (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2017. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Cardiomyopathies diagnosis
Cardiomyopathies mortality
Cardiomyopathies physiopathology
Cause of Death
Death, Sudden, Cardiac epidemiology
Electric Countershock adverse effects
Electric Countershock mortality
Female
France epidemiology
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Ischemia diagnosis
Myocardial Ischemia mortality
Myocardial Ischemia physiopathology
Proportional Hazards Models
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Cardiomyopathies therapy
Death, Sudden, Cardiac prevention & control
Defibrillators, Implantable
Electric Countershock instrumentation
Myocardial Ischemia epidemiology
Primary Prevention instrumentation
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1532-2092
- Volume :
- 20
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 28082419
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw379