Back to Search
Start Over
The efficacy and safety of co-administration of fimasartan and rosuvastatin to patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia.
- Source :
-
BMC pharmacology & toxicology [BMC Pharmacol Toxicol] 2017 Jan 05; Vol. 18 (1), pp. 2. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jan 05. - Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Background: Hypertension and dyslipidemia are major risk factors of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the co-administration of fimasartan and rosuvastatin in patients with hypertension and hypercholesterolemia.<br />Methods: We conducted a randomized double-blind and parallel-group trial. Patients who met eligible criteria after 4 weeks of therapeutic life change were randomly assigned to the following groups. 1) co-administration of fimasartan 120 mg/rosuvastatin 20 mg (FMS/RSV), 2) fimasartan 120 mg (FMS) alone 3) rosuvastatin 20 mg (RSV) alone. Drugs were administered once daily for 8 weeks.<br />Results: Of 140 randomized patients, 135 for whom efficacy data were available were analyzed. After 8 weeks of treatment, the FMS/RSV treatment group showed greater reductions in sitting systolic (siSBP) and diastolic (siDBP) blood pressures than those in the group receiving RSV alone (both p < 0.001). Reductions in siSBP and siDBP were not significantly different between the FMS/RSV and FMS alone groups (p = 0.500 and p = 0.734, respectively). After 8 weeks of treatment, FMS/RSV treatment showed greater efficacy in percentage reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level from baseline than that shown by FMS alone treatment (p < 0.001). The response rates of siSBP with FMS/RSV, FMS alone, and RSV alone treatments were 65.22, 55.56, and 34.09%, respectively (FMS/RSV vs. RSV, p = 0.006). The LDL-C goal attainment rates with FMS/RSV, RSV alone, and FMS alone treatments were 80.43%, 81.82%, and 15.56%, respectively (FMS/RSV vs. FMS, p < 0.001). Incidence of adverse drug reactions with FMS/RSV treatment was 8.33%, which was similar to those associated with FMS and RSV alone treatments.<br />Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the co-administration of fimasartan and rosuvastatin to patients with both hypertension and hypercholesterolemia was efficacious and safe.<br />Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02166814 . 16 June 2014.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers administration & dosage
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers adverse effects
Anticholesteremic Agents administration & dosage
Anticholesteremic Agents adverse effects
Biphenyl Compounds administration & dosage
Biphenyl Compounds adverse effects
Double-Blind Method
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Humans
Hypercholesterolemia complications
Hypertension complications
Male
Middle Aged
Pyrimidines administration & dosage
Pyrimidines adverse effects
Rosuvastatin Calcium administration & dosage
Rosuvastatin Calcium adverse effects
Tetrazoles administration & dosage
Tetrazoles adverse effects
Young Adult
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers therapeutic use
Anticholesteremic Agents therapeutic use
Biphenyl Compounds therapeutic use
Hypercholesterolemia drug therapy
Hypertension drug therapy
Pyrimidines therapeutic use
Rosuvastatin Calcium therapeutic use
Tetrazoles therapeutic use
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2050-6511
- Volume :
- 18
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- BMC pharmacology & toxicology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 28057081
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-016-0112-7