Back to Search
Start Over
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data.
- Source :
-
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions [JACC Cardiovasc Interv] 2016 Dec 26; Vol. 9 (24), pp. 2481-2489. - Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Objectives: The authors undertook a patient-level meta-analysis to compare long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) in 3,280 patients with left main or multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD).<br />Background: The relative efficacy and safety of CABG versus PCI with DES for left main or multivessel CAD remain controversial.<br />Methods: Data were pooled from the BEST (Randomized Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Everolimus Eluting Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease), PRECOMBAT (Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery vs. Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease), and SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) trials. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.<br />Results: The median follow-up was 60 months, and follow-up was completed for 96.2% of patients. The rate of primary outcome was significantly lower with CABG than with PCI (13.0% vs. 16.0%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69 to 1.00; p = 0.046). The difference was mainly driven by reduction in myocardial infarction (HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.64; p < 0.001). There was significant interaction between treatment effect and types of CAD, showing CABG to be superior compared with PCI with DES in patients with multivessel CAD (p = 0.001), but no between-group difference in those with left main CAD (p = 0.427). The rates for all-cause death and stroke were similar between the 2 groups. By contrast, the need for repeat revascularization was significantly lower in the CABG group compared with the PCI group.<br />Conclusions: CABG, as compared with PCI with DES, reduced long-term rates of the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke in patients with left main or multivessel CAD. The advantage of CABG over PCI with DES was particularly pronounced in those with multivessel CAD.<br /> (Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Coronary Artery Disease diagnostic imaging
Coronary Artery Disease mortality
Coronary Artery Disease surgery
Female
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction etiology
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention adverse effects
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention mortality
Proportional Hazards Models
Prosthesis Design
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Risk Factors
Stroke etiology
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Coronary Artery Bypass adverse effects
Coronary Artery Bypass mortality
Coronary Artery Disease therapy
Drug-Eluting Stents
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention instrumentation
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1876-7605
- Volume :
- 9
- Issue :
- 24
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 28007199
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.10.008