Back to Search Start Over

qPCR detection of Mycobacterium leprae in biopsies and slit skin smear of different leprosy clinical forms.

Authors :
Azevedo MC
Ramuno NM
Fachin LR
Tassa M
Rosa PS
Belone AF
Diório SM
Soares CT
Garlet GP
Trombone AP
Source :
The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases [Braz J Infect Dis] 2017 Jan - Feb; Vol. 21 (1), pp. 71-78. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Nov 24.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Leprosy, whose etiological agent is Mycobacterium leprae, is a chronic infectious disease that mainly affects the skin and peripheral nervous system. The diagnosis of leprosy is based on clinical evaluation, whereas histopathological analysis and bacilloscopy are complementary diagnostic tools. Quantitative PCR (qPCR), a current useful tool for diagnosis of infectious diseases, has been used to detect several pathogens including Mycobacterium leprae. The validation of this technique in a robust set of samples comprising the different clinical forms of leprosy is still necessary. Thus, in this study samples from 126 skin biopsies (collected from patients on all clinical forms and reactional states of leprosy) and 25 slit skin smear of leprosy patients were comparatively analyzed by qPCR (performed with primers for the RLEP region of M. leprae DNA) and routine bacilloscopy performed in histological sections or in slit skin smear. Considering clinical diagnostic as the gold standard, 84.9% of the leprosy patients were qPCR positive in skin biopsies, resulting in 84.92% sensitivity, with 84.92 and 61.22% positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, respectively. Concerning bacilloscopy of histological sections (BI/H), the sensitivity was 80.15% and the PPV and NPV were 80.15 and 44.44%, respectively. The concordance between qPCR and BI/H was 87.30%. Regarding the slit skin smear, 84% of the samples tested positive in the qPCR. Additionally, qPCR showed 100% specificity, since all samples from different mycobacteria, from healthy individuals, and from other granulomatous diseases presented negative results. In conclusion, the qPCR technique for detection of M. leprae using RLEP primers proved to be specific and sensitive, and qPCR can be used as a complementary test to diagnose leprosy irrespective of the clinical form of disease.<br /> (Copyright © 2016 Sociedade Brasileira de Infectologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1678-4391
Volume :
21
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27888674
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2016.09.017