Back to Search Start Over

Desensitisation to cigarette package graphic health warnings: a cohort comparison between London and Singapore.

Authors :
Ratneswaran C
Chisnall B
Li M
Tan S
Douiri A
Anantham D
Steier J
Source :
BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2016 Oct 24; Vol. 6 (10), pp. e012693. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Oct 24.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Objectives: We compared 2 sociocultural cohorts with different duration of exposure to graphic health warning labels (GHWL), to investigate a possible desensitisation to their use. We further studied how a differing awareness and emotional impact of smoking-associated risks could be used to prevent this.<br />Setting: Structured interviews of patients from the general respiratory department were undertaken between 2012 and 2013 in 2 tertiary hospitals in Singapore and London.<br />Participants: 266 participants were studied, 163 Londoners (35% smokers, 54% male, age 52±18 years) and 103 Singaporeans (53% smokers, p=0.003; 78% male, p<0.001; age 58±15 years, p=0.012).<br />Main Outcomes and Measures: 50 items assessed demographics, smoking history, knowledge and the deterring impact of smoking-associated risks. After showing 10 GHWL, the impact on emotional response, cognitive processing and intended smoking behaviour was recorded.<br />Results: Singaporeans scored lower than the Londoners across all label processing constructs, and this was consistent for the smoking and non-smoking groups. Londoners experienced more 'disgust' and felt GHWL were more effective at preventing initiation of, or quitting, smoking. Singaporeans had a lower awareness of lung cancer (82% vs 96%, p<0.001), despite ranking it as the most deterring consequence of smoking. Overall, 'blindness' was the least known potential risk (28%), despite being ranked as more deterring than 'stroke' and 'oral cancer' in all participants.<br />Conclusions: The length of exposure to GHWL impacts on the effectiveness. However, acknowledging the different levels of awareness and emotional impact of smoking-associated risks within different sociocultural cohorts could be used to maintain their impact.<br />Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: None declared.<br /> (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2044-6055
Volume :
6
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMJ open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27798017
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012693