Back to Search Start Over

Method for selection of optimal road safety composite index with examples from DEA and TOPSIS method.

Authors :
Rosić M
Pešić D
Kukić D
Antić B
Božović M
Source :
Accident; analysis and prevention [Accid Anal Prev] 2017 Jan; Vol. 98, pp. 277-286. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Oct 25.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Concept of composite road safety index is a popular and relatively new concept among road safety experts around the world. As there is a constant need for comparison among different units (countries, municipalities, roads, etc.) there is need to choose an adequate method which will make comparison fair to all compared units. Usually comparisons using one specific indicator (parameter which describes safety or unsafety) can end up with totally different ranking of compared units which is quite complicated for decision maker to determine "real best performers". Need for composite road safety index is becoming dominant since road safety presents a complex system where more and more indicators are constantly being developed to describe it. Among wide variety of models and developed composite indexes, a decision maker can come to even bigger dilemma than choosing one adequate risk measure. As DEA and TOPSIS are well-known mathematical models and have recently been increasingly used for risk evaluation in road safety, we used efficiencies (composite indexes) obtained by different models, based on DEA and TOPSIS, to present PROMETHEE-RS model for selection of optimal method for composite index. Method for selection of optimal composite index is based on three parameters (average correlation, average rank variation and average cluster variation) inserted into a PROMETHEE MCDM method in order to choose the optimal one. The model is tested by comparing 27 police departments in Serbia.<br /> (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-2057
Volume :
98
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Accident; analysis and prevention
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27792946
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.10.007