Back to Search
Start Over
Impact of aortic valve closure on adverse events and outcomes with the HeartWare ventricular assist device.
- Source :
-
The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation [J Heart Lung Transplant] 2017 Jan; Vol. 36 (1), pp. 42-49. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Aug 18. - Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Background: This study examined whether aortic valve opening (AVO) and other echocardiographic parameters influence outcomes in patients on left ventricular (LV) assist device (LVAD) support. Pump thrombosis (PT) and ischemic stroke (IS) are known complications of LVAD, but mechanisms that could influence them are not completely understood.<br />Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 147 patients who received a HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device ( HeartWare International) as a bridge to transplant or to candidacy between July 2009 and August 2015, of whom 126 had at least 30 days of follow-up before the first event (30-days-out cohort). Outcomes included survival, PT, IS, and PT+IS (combined thrombotic event; CTE).<br />Results: Median time on support was 518 days. Of the 30-days-out cohort, 29% had a first PT and 19% a first IS. AVO was associated with longer survival on device (1,081 vs 723 days; p = 0.01) in the entire cohort. In the 30-days-out cohort, the aortic valve was more frequently closed in patients with lower ejection fractions on support (14% ± 6% vs 18% ± 9%; p = 0.009), more dilated pre-event echocardiogram (LV end-diastolic diameter, 66 ± 12 mm vs 62 ± 10 mm; p = 0.04), and pre-implant LV end-diastolic diameter (70 ± 10 mm vs 66 ± 9 mm; p = 0.06). CTE-free survival on the device was lower with a closed aortic valve (897 vs 1,314 days; p = 0.003) as was PT-free survival on the device (1,070 vs 1,457 days; p = 0.02). Cox regression analysis showed that AVO was an independent predictor of CTE (p = 0.03) CONCLUSIONS: Thrombotic events are relatively frequent in patients on long-term LVAD support. A closed aortic valve was associated with decreased overall survival, thrombosis-free survival, and poorer LV function on support. These are high-risk patients, so whether they require more intense anti-coagulation or prioritizing for transplantation requires further research.<br /> (Copyright © 2016 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Aortic Valve diagnostic imaging
Diastole
Disease-Free Survival
Echocardiography
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Failure mortality
Heart Failure physiopathology
Heart Transplantation
Heart Ventricles diagnostic imaging
Humans
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Prognosis
Prosthesis Failure
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate trends
Thrombosis etiology
Time Factors
Aortic Valve physiopathology
Heart Failure therapy
Heart Ventricles physiopathology
Heart-Assist Devices adverse effects
Thrombosis epidemiology
Ventricular Function, Left physiology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1557-3117
- Volume :
- 36
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 27776988
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2016.08.006