Back to Search
Start Over
Efficacy of Second-line Targeted Therapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma According to Change from Baseline in International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium Prognostic Category.
- Source :
-
European urology [Eur Urol] 2017 Jun; Vol. 71 (6), pp. 970-978. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Oct 19. - Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Background: We hypothesized that changes in International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic category at start of second-line therapy (2L) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) might predict response.<br />Objective: To assess outcomes of 2L according to type of therapy and change in IMDC prognostic category.<br />Design, Setting, and Participants: We performed a retrospective review of the IMDC database for mRCC patients who received first-line (1L) VEGF inhibitors (VEGFi) and then 2L with VEGFi or mTOR inhibitors (mTORi). IMDC prognostic categories were defined before each line of therapy (favorable, F; intermediate, I; poor, P). Data were analyzed for 1516 patients, of whom 89% had clear cell histology.<br />Intervention: All included patients received targeted therapy for mRCC.<br />Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure, and response to 2L were analyzed using Cox or logistic regression.<br />Results and Limitations: At start of 2L, 60% of patients remained in the same prognostic category; 9.0% improved (3% I → F; 6% P → I); 31% deteriorated (15% F → I or P; 16% I → P). Patients with the same or better IMDC prognostic category had a longer time to treatment failure if they remained on VEGFi compared to those who switched to mTORi (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] ranging from 0.33 to 0.78, adjusted p<0.05). Patients who deteriorated from F to I appeared more likely to benefit from switching to mTORi (median OS 16.5 mo, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.0-19.0 for VEGFi; 20.2 mo, 95% CI 14.3-26.1 for mTORi; AHR 1.53, 95% CI 1.04-2.24; adjusted p=0.03).<br />Conclusions: Changes in IMDC prognostic category predict the subsequent clinical course for patients with mRCC and provide a rational basis for selection of subsequent therapy.<br />Patient Summary: The pattern of treatment failure might help to predict what the next treatment should be for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.<br /> (Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Angiogenesis Inhibitors adverse effects
Carcinoma, Renal Cell enzymology
Carcinoma, Renal Cell secondary
Databases, Factual
Disease Progression
Disease-Free Survival
Drug Substitution
Female
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Kidney Neoplasms enzymology
Kidney Neoplasms pathology
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Odds Ratio
Proportional Hazards Models
Protein Kinase Inhibitors adverse effects
Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor antagonists & inhibitors
Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor metabolism
Retrospective Studies
Signal Transduction drug effects
TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases antagonists & inhibitors
TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases metabolism
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A antagonists & inhibitors
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A metabolism
Angiogenesis Inhibitors therapeutic use
Carcinoma, Renal Cell drug therapy
Kidney Neoplasms drug therapy
Molecular Targeted Therapy
Protein Kinase Inhibitors therapeutic use
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1873-7560
- Volume :
- 71
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- European urology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 27771126
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.047