Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy of Second-line Targeted Therapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma According to Change from Baseline in International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium Prognostic Category.

Authors :
Davis ID
Xie W
Pezaro C
Donskov F
Wells JC
Agarwal N
Srinivas S
Yuasa T
Beuselinck B
Wood LA
Ernst DS
Kanesvaran R
Knox JJ
Pantuck A
Saleem S
Alva A
Rini BI
Lee JL
Choueiri TK
Heng DYC
Source :
European urology [Eur Urol] 2017 Jun; Vol. 71 (6), pp. 970-978. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Oct 19.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Background: We hypothesized that changes in International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic category at start of second-line therapy (2L) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) might predict response.<br />Objective: To assess outcomes of 2L according to type of therapy and change in IMDC prognostic category.<br />Design, Setting, and Participants: We performed a retrospective review of the IMDC database for mRCC patients who received first-line (1L) VEGF inhibitors (VEGFi) and then 2L with VEGFi or mTOR inhibitors (mTORi). IMDC prognostic categories were defined before each line of therapy (favorable, F; intermediate, I; poor, P). Data were analyzed for 1516 patients, of whom 89% had clear cell histology.<br />Intervention: All included patients received targeted therapy for mRCC.<br />Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure, and response to 2L were analyzed using Cox or logistic regression.<br />Results and Limitations: At start of 2L, 60% of patients remained in the same prognostic category; 9.0% improved (3% I → F; 6% P → I); 31% deteriorated (15% F → I or P; 16% I → P). Patients with the same or better IMDC prognostic category had a longer time to treatment failure if they remained on VEGFi compared to those who switched to mTORi (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] ranging from 0.33 to 0.78, adjusted p<0.05). Patients who deteriorated from F to I appeared more likely to benefit from switching to mTORi (median OS 16.5 mo, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.0-19.0 for VEGFi; 20.2 mo, 95% CI 14.3-26.1 for mTORi; AHR 1.53, 95% CI 1.04-2.24; adjusted p=0.03).<br />Conclusions: Changes in IMDC prognostic category predict the subsequent clinical course for patients with mRCC and provide a rational basis for selection of subsequent therapy.<br />Patient Summary: The pattern of treatment failure might help to predict what the next treatment should be for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.<br /> (Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-7560
Volume :
71
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27771126
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.047