Back to Search Start Over

Live weight, conformation, carcass traits and economic values of ram lambs of Red Maasai and Dorper sheep and their crosses.

Authors :
Zonabend König E
Ojango JM
Audho J
Mirkena T
Strandberg E
Okeyo AM
Philipsson J
Source :
Tropical animal health and production [Trop Anim Health Prod] 2017 Jan; Vol. 49 (1), pp. 121-129. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Oct 14.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Meat production is the most important trait in the breeding objectives of sheep production in East Africa. The aim of this study was to investigate breed differences in live weight, conformation, carcass traits and economic values for meat production among Red Maasai and Dorper sheep and their crosses. In total, 88 ram lambs, which were reared at the ILRI experimental station, Kapiti plains Estate in Central Kenya, were used for the study. The lambs were slaughtered at Kenya Meat Commission (KMC) at about 1 year of age. Prior to slaughter, the lambs were weighed, measured and assessed by experienced evaluators, and at the abattoir carcass traits were recorded. Large breed differences were found for most traits. Dorper lambs were heavier at delivery for slaughter and had better carcass grade but lower dressing percentage and fat levels than Red Maasai. Crossbreds were generally better than the parental breeds. Evaluators were willing to pay more for the Dorper lambs for slaughter although carcass weights later were shown not to be higher than for Red Maasai. Evaluators undervalued Red Maasai lambs by 8-13 % compared to Dorper lambs according to the prices quoted per kilogramme live or carcass weight by KMC. Live weight was better than any other live measure in predicting carcass weight. Due to the overall higher ranking of the crossbred lambs for meat production, Dorper may be useful as a terminal sire breed for crossing with Red Maasai ewes.<br />Competing Interests: Compliance with ethical standards Funding This study was funded by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, and by a grant provided by the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1573-7438
Volume :
49
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Tropical animal health and production
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27743146
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-016-1168-5