Back to Search Start Over

Optimal Medical Therapy in Patients with Malignancy Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: a BleeMACS Sub-Study.

Authors :
Iannaccone M
D Ascenzo F
De Filippo O
Gagliardi M
Southern DA
Raposeiras-Roubín S
Abu-Assi E
Henriques JPS
Saucedo J
González-Juanatey JR
Wilton SB
Kikkert WJ
Nuñez-Gil I
Ariza-Sole A
Song X
Alexopoulos D
Liebetrau C
Kawaji T
Huczek Z
Nie SP
Fujii T
Correia L
Kawashiri MA
García-Acuña JM
Alfonso E
Terol B
Garay A
Zhang D
Chen Y
Xanthopoulou I
Osman N
Möllmann H
Shiomi H
Kowara M
Filipiak K
Wang X
Yan Y
Fan JY
Ikari Y
Nakahashi T
Sakata K
Yamagishi M
Moretti C
Gaita F
Kalpak O
Kedev S
Source :
American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions [Am J Cardiovasc Drugs] 2017 Feb; Vol. 17 (1), pp. 61-71.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to define the most appropriate treatment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with malignancy.<br />Methods and Results: The BleeMACS project is a worldwide multicenter observational prospective registry in 16 hospitals enrolling patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Primary endpoints were death, re-infarction, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE; composite of death and re-infarction) after 1 year of follow-up. The secondary endpoint was bleeding events during follow-up. We performed sub-study analyses according to whether β-blockers (BBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), statins, or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were prescribed at discharge. We also calculated the propensity score for optimal medical therapy (OMT; combination of BB, ACEI/ARB, and statins). The study included 926 patients. According to the multivariate analysis, ACEIs/ARBs (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.36-1.94; p = 0.03) and statins (HR 0.37, 95 % CI 0.23-0.61; p < 0.01) reduced the risk of MACE, while the effects of BBs (HR 0.85, 95 % CI 0.55-1.32; p = 0.48) and PPIs (HR 1.33, 95 % CI 0.83-2.12; p = 0.23) were not significant. OMT was prescribed at discharge in 300 (32.4 %) patients; after propensity score analysis, OMT showed a significant reduction in death (3 % vs. 12.5 %, HR 0.21, 95 % CI 0.1-0.4; log-rank p < 0.001) and MACE (6.7 vs. 15.2 %, log-rank p = 0.01).<br />Conclusion: In patients with ACS and malignancy, OMT reduces the risk of adverse events at 1 year; in particular, ACEIs/ARBs and statins were the most protective drugs. (Clinical trials identifier: NCT02466854).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1179-187X
Volume :
17
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27738920
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-016-0196-x