Back to Search Start Over

Bovine epididymal spermatozoa: Resistance to cryopreservation and binding ability to oviductal cells.

Authors :
Cunha ATM
Carvalho JO
Kussano NR
Martins CF
Mourão GB
Dode MAN
Source :
Cryobiology [Cryobiology] 2016 Dec; Vol. 73 (3), pp. 348-355. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Sep 28.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

In this study we examined quality, longevity and ability of epididymal sperm (EP) to bind to oviduct explants (OE) after cooling and cryopreservation. Ejaculated (EJ) and EP sperm from seven bulls were evaluated before, during and after cryopreservation for total (TM), progressive motility (PM), sperm morphology, plasma membrane integrity (PMI) and acrosome integrity (ACI). For longevity, cryopreserved EP, EJ and a third group of cells in which EP spermatozoa were incubated with seminal plasm (SP) for 10 min after thawing (EPP group), were compared, and the groups were analyzed at 0, 3, 6, and 24 h for all parameters. Sperm from each group were co-incubated with OE for 30 min, 6 h, and 24 h for binding evaluation. Data were analyzed by the generalized linear models SAS 9.1 (P < 0.05). After cooling, EP displayed higher TM, higher PMI, and higher ACI (P < 0.05) than EJ. No differences were noted in the percentage of spermatozoa with PMI and AI between EJ and EP for fresh, cooled or cryopreserved sperm. However, a reduction in motility occurred in the EJ sperm after cooling, while in EP group such reduction occurred only after cryopreservation. At 6 h of incubation EP and EPP had higher PMI and ACI than EJ (P < 0.05). The number of spermatozoa bound to OE was similar P > 0.05) for all groups either at 30 min or 24 h. We conclude that EP are more resistant to cooling than EJ, and can bind to OE similarly to EJ.<br /> (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1090-2392
Volume :
73
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Cryobiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27693236
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2016.09.170