Back to Search
Start Over
Atypical Apocrine Adenosis: Diagnostic Challenges and Pitfalls.
- Source :
-
Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine [Arch Pathol Lab Med] 2016 Oct; Vol. 140 (10), pp. 1045-51. - Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Apocrine change in the breast is an extremely common finding. In most cases, the benign or malignant nature of the lesion is easily recognized. Apocrine adenosis is used to describe sclerosing adenosis with apocrine change. The term apocrine atypia is used when there is significant cytologic atypia in apocrine cells, characterized by a 3-fold nuclear enlargement, prominent/multiple nucleoli, and hyperchromasia. Atypical apocrine adenosis is diagnosed when apocrine adenosis and apocrine atypia are superimposed. However, there are no definite criteria to distinguish atypical apocrine adenosis from apocrine ductal carcinoma in situ. Immunohistochemical markers can be confounding and may lead to erroneous diagnoses. Atypical apocrine features in sclerosing lesions may be misinterpreted as invasive carcinoma if the underlying lesion is not recognized. In the absence of definite features of malignancy, the diagnosis of apocrine ductal carcinoma in situ may be extremely difficult. In the present article, we review atypical apocrine adenosis focusing on diagnostic challenges and their implications on clinical management.
- Subjects :
- Apocrine Glands metabolism
Breast metabolism
Carrier Proteins metabolism
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Fibrocystic Breast Disease metabolism
Glycoproteins metabolism
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Membrane Transport Proteins
Metaplasia
Precancerous Conditions metabolism
Apocrine Glands pathology
Breast pathology
Fibrocystic Breast Disease diagnosis
Precancerous Conditions diagnosis
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1543-2165
- Volume :
- 140
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 27684975
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2016-0238-RA