Back to Search Start Over

Independent predictors of a clinically significant improvement after lumbar fusion surgery.

Authors :
Alentado VJ
Caldwell S
Gould HP
Steinmetz MP
Benzel EC
Mroz TE
Source :
The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society [Spine J] 2017 Feb; Vol. 17 (2), pp. 236-243. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Sep 21.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Background Context: Multiple studies have determined minimum clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds for EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) scores in lumbar fusion patients. However, a comprehensive understanding of predictors for a clinically significant improvement (CSI) postoperatively does not exist.<br />Purpose: To determine medical, radiographic, and surgical predictors for obtaining a CSI following lumbar fusion surgery.<br />Study Design: This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent instrumented lumbar fusion.<br />Patient Sample: We included patients who underwent lumbar fusion for any indication between 2008 and 2013.<br />Outcome Measures: Outcome measures included preoperative and postoperative EQ-5D Index scores.<br />Materials and Methods: The medical records of patients who received a lumbar fusion for any indication were retrospectively reviewed to identify patient medical and surgical characteristics. A blinded reviewer assessed radiographs for each patient to examine sagittal alignment following fusion. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the achievement of a CSI based on two commonly cited MCID values.<br />Results: A total of 231 patients fit the inclusion criteria; 58% exceeded an MCID value for an EQ-5D score of 0.100, and 16% exceeded an MCID value of 0.390. Statistically significant independent predictors of not obtaining a CSI for an MCID threshold of 0.100 included a higher preoperative EQ-5D score (odds ratio [OR]=44.8) and L5-S1 fusion (OR=3.3). For an MCID value of 0.390, a higher preoperative EQ-5D score (OR=2,080.8) and a diagnosis of depression (OR=7.1) were predictive of not achieving a CSI, whereas spondylolisthesis (OR=4.1) was predictive of obtaining a CSI postoperatively. For both MCID values, patients who achieved a CSI had better postoperative quality of life (QOL) scores for all metrics measured, despite worse QOL scores preoperatively.<br />Conclusions: This study is the first to use a combination of medical, surgical, and postoperative sagittal balance variables as determinants for the achievement of a CSI after lumbar fusion. The awareness of these predictors may allow for better patient selection and surgical approach to decrease the probability of acquiring a poor outcome postoperatively.<br /> (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1878-1632
Volume :
17
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27664340
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.09.011