Start Over

Systematic review of renal carcinoma prognostic factors.

Authors :: Lorente D
Trilla E
Meseguer A
Planas J
Placer J
Celma A
Salvador C
Regis L
Morote J
Source :: Actas urologicas espanolas [Actas Urol Esp] 2017 May; Vol. 41 (4), pp. 215-225. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Sep 20.
Publication Year :: 2017
Abstract: Context and Objectives: The natural history of renal cell carcinoma is heterogeneous. Some scenarios can be found in terms of clinical presentation, clinical evolution or type of recurrence (local/metastatic). The aim of this publication is to analyze the most important prognostic factors published in the literature.<br />Evidence Acquisition: A literature review ob published papers was performed using the Pubmed, from first Motzer's classification published in 1999 to 2015, according to PRISMA declaration. Search was done using the following keywords: kidney neoplasm, kidney cancer, renal cell carcinoma, prognostic factors, mortality, survival and disease progression. Papers were classified according to level of evidence, the number of patients included and the type of study performed.<br />Evidence Synthesis: The evolution in the knowledge of molecular pathways related to renal oncogenesis and the new targeted therapies has left to remain obsolete the old prognostic models. It's necessary to perform a continuous review to actualize nomograms and to adapt them to the new scenarios.<br />Conclusions: Is necessary to perform a proper external validation of existing prognostic factors using prospective and multicentric studies to add them into the daily urologist clinical practice.<br /> (Copyright © 2016 AEU. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)